07.12.2012 Views

e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu

e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu

e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Box 3.2. Lack of financial tools for improving electronic access at the municipal level:<br />

the Finnish Consumer Agency<br />

The Finnish Consumer Agency maintains a network of 180 municipal consumer counsellors (Finland has about<br />

450 municipalities). They are civil servants and the first point of contact for customer complaints. They can, for<br />

example, negotiate with a shopkeeper on behalf of a consumer over a purchase dispute.<br />

While services are delivered in partnership with municipalities, the agency’s lack of influence over resource<br />

allocation at the municipal level has sometimes been an important challenge for online service delivery. Municipal<br />

consumer counsellors have access to an extranet containing information for resolving consumer questions and<br />

exchanging information on cases. Service quality can vary, however, with the quality of municipal tools and Internet<br />

access. As an official of the agency explained: “Some municipalities have a lot and some have nothing, but from the<br />

point of view of citizens they should all have equal services. In a recent presentation, one municipal counsellor asked:<br />

‘can you e-mail me the presentation without pictures because my modem is so slow?’ Public libraries provide good<br />

access, but there is a pecking order in municipal budgets for IT equipment, so engineers might get new equipment,<br />

but economic counsellors tend to be a lower priority.”<br />

Municipalities have asked the agency to provide funding for the purchase of new equipment. Ten years ago, this<br />

would have been possible, but changes in state subsidies to municipalities have eliminated the earmarking of funds<br />

for different projects in order to improve flexibility. They can no longer tell municipalities what to do with the funds<br />

they receive.<br />

Key Points - 16<br />

x -Decentralisation of spending authority has reduced the ability of central government to<br />

promote specific aspects of electronic service delivery at the local and regional level<br />

3.3 Technological barriers<br />

106. Technology constitutes a basic prerequisite for e-government advancement. In the OECD survey,<br />

respondents did not consider it the most important challenge (compared to leadership and the development<br />

of skills – see Part 4.5, “Back-office changes”), but nonetheless recognised its importance. The following<br />

part reviews the main challenges that technology and information management pose to ministries and<br />

agencies and why some organisations face particular challenges.<br />

3.3.1 Relative importance of IT challenges<br />

107. The OECD survey asked ministries and central agencies to indicate which factors concerning<br />

technology and information management had been a challenge or a constraint when implementing egovernment.<br />

In the Finnish context, information management comprises those “operations which develop<br />

and maintain the information reserves, information technology services and information processes of an<br />

organisation”. Figure 6 illustrates the relative importance of the ten different ICT challenges.<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!