12.02.2016 Views

Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2014

GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report

GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Inventories of emissions of GHGs and other relevant substances 107<br />

The approach taken in this study is compatible with the Second <strong>IMO</strong> GHG <strong>Study</strong> 2009, which defined PM as<br />

substances including sulphate, water associated with sulphate ash and organic carbons, measured by dilution<br />

method. Therefore, the model can accommodate changes in fuel sulphur content. This reflects the changes in<br />

PM emissions factors arising from ECAs as defined in MARPOL Annex VI.<br />

For further information on specific emissions factors, FCFs and references, see Annex 6.<br />

CO baseline<br />

Emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) were determined by methods originally described in Sarvi et al. (2008),<br />

Kristensen (2012) and IVL (2004). From these sources, the CO EF baseline factors presented in Table 45 were<br />

used.<br />

Table 45 – CO baseline emissions factors<br />

Eng speed/type Fuel type ME EF baseline (kg/tonne fuel) Aux eng EF baseline (kg/tonne fuel) Reference<br />

SSD<br />

MSD<br />

HSD<br />

HFO<br />

HFO<br />

HFO<br />

2.77<br />

2.51<br />

na<br />

na<br />

2.38<br />

2.38<br />

EPA, 2007<br />

EPA, 2007<br />

EPA, 2007<br />

Otto LNG 7.83 7.83 Kristensen, 2012<br />

GT HFO 0.33 na IVL, 2004<br />

STM HFO 0.66 na IVL, 2004<br />

It should be noted that CO emissions are also unaffected by the sulphur content of the fuel burned and are<br />

the same for HFO and distillates. For further information on specific emissions factors and references, see<br />

Annex 6.<br />

CH 4 baseline<br />

Emissions of methane (CH 4 ) were determined by analysis of test results reported in IVL (2004) and MARINTEK<br />

(2010). Methane emissions factors for diesel-fuelled engines, steam boilers and gas turbines are taken from IVL<br />

(2004), which states that CH 4 emissions are approximately 2% magnitude of VOC. Therefore, the EF baseline is<br />

derived by multiplying the NMVOC EF baseline by 2%. The emissions factor for LNG Otto-cycle engines is 8.5g/<br />

kWh, which is on a par with the data for LNG engines (MARINTEK, 2010 and <strong>2014</strong>). However, this value may<br />

be slightly low for older gas-fuelled engines, especially if run on low engine loads, and slightly high for the<br />

latest generation of LNG engines (Wärtsilä, 2011). This emissions factor was used in the bottom-up approach<br />

to determine the amount of methane released to the atmosphere from each of the vessels powered by LNG.<br />

The majority of LNG-powered engines operating during the 2007–2012 time frame are assumed to be Ottocycle;<br />

all LNG engines have been modelled as low-pressure, spark injection Otto-cycle engines, which have<br />

low NO x emissions. From these sources, the CH 4 EF baseline factors presented in Table 46 were used.<br />

Table 46 – CH 4 baseline emissions factors<br />

Eng speed/type Fuel type ME EF baseline (kg/tonne fuel) Aux eng EF baseline (kg/tonne fuel) Reference<br />

SSD<br />

MSD<br />

HSD<br />

HFO<br />

HFO<br />

HFO<br />

0.06<br />

0.05<br />

na<br />

na<br />

0.04<br />

0.04<br />

IVL, 2004<br />

IVL, 2004<br />

IVL, 2004<br />

Otto LNG 51.2 51.2 MARINTEK, 2010<br />

GT HFO 0.01 na IVL, 2004<br />

STM HFO 0.01 na IVL, 2004<br />

It should be noted that CH 4 emissions are also unaffected by the sulphur content of the fuel burned and are<br />

the same for HFO and distillates. For further information on specific emissions factors and references, see<br />

Annex 6.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!