12.02.2016 Views

Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2014

GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report

GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

240 <strong>Third</strong> <strong>IMO</strong> GHG <strong>Study</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />

b<br />

from the extrapolation of observed activity to estimate the operating parameters when the ship<br />

is not observed.<br />

The first of these is a function of a relative speed between the water and the ground – e.g. tides and currents<br />

– and is therefore a function of the metocean conditions in which the ship is sailing. These conditions cannot<br />

be easily generalized; some ships may spend all their time operating in areas of high tidal flows and current<br />

(typically coastal shipping) and others may spend little time operating in such areas (typically, although not<br />

necessarily, when a ship is in the open ocean). To estimate the variability, we have used operator data supplied<br />

for a fleet of twenty ships (a mixture of bulk carriers and tankers with a variety of ship sizes) for which<br />

measurements of average speed through the water and average speed over ground were available, averaged<br />

over 24 hours. The ships are owned by a variety of companies but managed by the same company and have<br />

consistent data reporting mechanisms. In total they represent approximately 80 ship years of operation and<br />

data. Figure 27 displays the estimate of the probability density function of the difference between speed over<br />

ground and speed through the water. The average difference is -0.14 knots and the standard deviation is 0.95<br />

knots. Implicit in this distribution is the measurement error associated with the speed logs used to obtain the<br />

speed through the water and the GPS used to obtain the speed over ground, but these are assumed to be<br />

negligible relative to the uncertainty in the difference between the two measurements.<br />

Figure 27: Relationship between speed over ground and speed through the water<br />

From the analysis described above in the section “Activity estimates temporal coverage QA/QC”, an estimate<br />

was found for the standard deviation of the uncertainty of speeds during an hour of operation. These values<br />

are:<br />

• For an observed hour, 0.75 kt<br />

• For an unobserved hour, 1.85 kt<br />

Combining these sources of uncertainty, we can estimate the total uncertainty for the two types of observation<br />

(see Table 18).<br />

Draught uncertainty<br />

Draught influences the underwater hull surface area and hull form. It varies during the course of a voyage and<br />

from one voyage to another. The measurement of draught is obtained from the data reported in AIS messages<br />

(see Section 1.2). On some ships, the value is entered manually (from draught mark readings or a loading<br />

computer), and on others it is reported from sensors. As the value is entered manually and rarely audited<br />

for quality, it is possible that spurious or null returns may be observed in the raw data. For the purposes of<br />

estimating the uncertainty of this parameter, the comparison between the noon report and the reported AIS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!