Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2014
GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report
GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
268 <strong>Third</strong> <strong>IMO</strong> GHG <strong>Study</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />
• The East Asia–US West Coast trade is, apart from the East Asia–Europe trade, the only trade that is<br />
currently ready for the 18,000 TEU size in terms of cargo volumes (ContPort Consult, 2013). So far, ship<br />
owners have been hesitant to utilize very large container ships due to the demand for a high sailing<br />
frequency combined with low terminal productivity at US ports (ContPort Consult, 2013). However,<br />
terminal productivity can be expected to increase until 2050, and more very large container ships can<br />
also expected to be utilized for this trade.<br />
Whether for the other trades even larger ships will be utilized by 2050 is, of course, debatable. Utilization rates<br />
may not be sufficient in the future, or intensive growth (i.e. higher capacity utilization) could, for example, lead<br />
to a slowing down of the ship size growth. For our projection, we therefore assume that the number of larger<br />
ships does increase but that this increase is not very pronounced.<br />
Table 37 gives an overview of the development of the distribution of ships over the size categories that we<br />
expect, along with the respective estimation of the 2050 distribution.<br />
Table 37 – Development of the distribution of container ships over size categories<br />
(in terms of numbers)<br />
Size category (TEU) 2012 distribution Development until 2050 2050 distribution<br />
0–999 22% Very low share of 0–499 TEU does not change; high share of 22%<br />
500–999 TEU unchanged.<br />
1,000–1,999 25% Trend that 1,000–1,999 TEU ships are replaced by<br />
20%<br />
2,000–2,999 14%<br />
2,000–2,999 TEU ships continues.<br />
18%<br />
3,000–4,999 19% Replaced by very large ships (14,500+ TEU) and by 5%<br />
larger ships that can transit Panama Canal after expansion<br />
(probably 8,000–11,999 TEU and some 12,000–14,500 TEU).<br />
5,000–7,999 11% Share as in 2012. 11%<br />
8,000–11,999 7% Share increases due to expansion of Panama Canal. 10%<br />
12,000–14,500 2% Share increases due to ongoing trend of using larger ships, 9%<br />
replacing 3,000–4,999 TEU ships, and due to expansion of<br />
Panama Canal, replacing 3,000–4,999 TEU ships.<br />
14,500–+ 0.2 % Share increases due to ongoing trend of using larger ships,<br />
replacing 3,000–4,999 TEU ships.<br />
5%<br />
If the average ship size per size bin does not change compared to 2012, the average size of a container ship<br />
will be approximately 4,600 TEU or 55,000 dwt in 2050.<br />
In Figure 43, the development of the average ship size of the cellular fleet is given for the period 1988–<strong>2014</strong>,<br />
showing a steady increase in the average size.<br />
An average size of 4,600 TEU in 2050 means that this trend will slow down in the period until 2050.