12.02.2016 Views

Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2014

GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report

GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

List of tables<br />

Page<br />

Table 1 – a) Shipping CO 2 emissions compared with global CO 2 (values in<br />

million tonnes CO 2 ); and b) Shipping GHGs (in CO 2 e)<br />

compared with global GHGs (values in million tonnes CO 2 e).. ................... 1<br />

Table 2 – International, domestic and fishing CO 2 emissions 2007–2011,<br />

using top-down method. ............................................... 10<br />

Table 3 – International, domestic and fishing CO 2 emissions 2007–2012,<br />

using bottom-up method.. .............................................. 10<br />

Table 4 – Relationship between slow steaming, engine load factor (power output)<br />

and fuel consumption for 2007 and 2012 ................................... 14<br />

Table 5 – Summary of the scenarios for future emissions from international shipping,<br />

GHGs and other relevant substances ...................................... 22<br />

Table 6 – AIS observation statistics of the fleet identified in the IHSF database<br />

as in service in 2007 and 2012 ........................................... 23<br />

Table 7 – Comparison of 2011 and 2012 marine fuels reporting to IEA ..................... 28<br />

Table 8 – Comparison of Second <strong>IMO</strong> GHG <strong>Study</strong> 2009 top-down ship fuel consumption data<br />

(million tonnes). ...................................................... 29<br />

Table 9 – Summary of IEA fuel sales data in shipping (million tonnes). ..................... 31<br />

Table 10 – IHSF vessel types and related vessel classes ................................. 35<br />

Table 11 – Classification of ships in the bottom-up approach. ............................ 38<br />

Table 12 – Summary of vessel types and sizes that can be expected to engage<br />

in international shipping ................................................ 40<br />

Table 13 – Summary of vessel types and sizes that can be expected to engage<br />

in domestic shipping .................................................. 41<br />

Table 14 – Tabular data for 2012 describing the fleet (international, domestic and fishing)<br />

analysed using the bottom-up method ..................................... 43<br />

Table 15 – International, domestic and fishing CO 2 emissions 2007–2011 (million tonnes),<br />

using the top-down method ............................................. 46<br />

Table 16 – International, domestic and fishing CO 2 emissions 2007–2012 (million tonnes),<br />

using the bottom-up method ............................................ 47<br />

Table 17 – Relationship between slow steaming, engine load factor (power output)<br />

and fuel consumption for 2007 and 2012 ................................... 55<br />

Table 18 – Bottom-up CO 2 e emissions estimates with climate-carbon feedbacks<br />

from total shipping (thousand tonnes) ...................................... 56<br />

Table 19 – Bottom-up CO 2 e emissions estimates with climate-carbon feedbacks<br />

from international shipping (thousand tonnes) ................................ 56<br />

Table 20 – Shipping CO 2 emissions compared with global CO 2<br />

(values in million tonnes CO 2 ) ........................................... 57<br />

Table 21 – Shipping CH 4 emissions compared with global CH 4<br />

(values in thousand tonnes CH 4 ).......................................... 58<br />

Table 22 – Shipping N 2 O emissions compared with global N 2 O<br />

(values in thousand tonnes N 2 O) ......................................... 58<br />

Table 23 – Shipping GHGs (in CO 2 e) compared with global GHGs<br />

(values in million tonnes CO 2 e). .......................................... 58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!