Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2014
GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report
GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
108 <strong>Third</strong> <strong>IMO</strong> GHG <strong>Study</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />
N 2 O baseline<br />
Emissions factors for N 2 O and LNG were taken from the EPA <strong>2014</strong> report on GHGs and Kunz & Gorse<br />
(2013), respectively. The LNG N 2 O EF baseline was converted from g/mmBTU to g/kWh assuming 38% engine<br />
efficiency, and then converted to grams of N 2 O per gram of fuel using an SFOC of 166g fuel/kWh. From these<br />
sources, the N 2 O EF baseline factors presented in Table 47 were used.<br />
Table 47 – N 2 O baseline emissions factors<br />
Eng speed/type Fuel type ME EF baseline (kg/tonne fuel) Aux eng EF baseline (kg/tonne fuel) Reference<br />
SSD<br />
MSD<br />
HSD<br />
HFO<br />
HFO<br />
HFO<br />
0.16<br />
0.16<br />
na<br />
na<br />
0.16<br />
0.16<br />
EPA, <strong>2014</strong><br />
EPA, <strong>2014</strong><br />
EPA, <strong>2014</strong><br />
Otto LNG 0.11 0.11 Kunz & Gorse, 2013<br />
GT HFO 0.16 na EPA, <strong>2014</strong><br />
STM HFO 0.16 na EPA, <strong>2014</strong><br />
It should be noted that, similar to NO x , N 2 O emissions are unaffected by fuel sulphur content but do change<br />
slightly between HFO and distillate fuels. For further information on specific emissions factors, FCFs and<br />
references, see Annex 6.<br />
NMVOC baseline<br />
Emissions factors for non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) were taken from ENTEC (2002)<br />
study and for LNG from Kristensen (2012) report. The LNG NMVOC emissions factor was conservatively<br />
assumed to be the same as the hydrocarbon emissions factor. From these sources, the NMVOC EF baseline<br />
factors presented in Table 48 were used for this study. It should be noted that NMVOCs and non-methane<br />
hydrocarbons have the same emissions factors.<br />
Table 48 – NMVOC baseline emissions factors<br />
Eng speed/type Fuel type ME EF baseline (kg/tonne fuel) Aux eng EF baseline (kg/tonne fuel) Reference<br />
SSD<br />
MSD<br />
HSD<br />
HFO<br />
HFO<br />
HFO<br />
3.08<br />
2.33<br />
na<br />
na<br />
1.76<br />
1.76<br />
ENTEC, 2002<br />
ENTEC, 2002<br />
ENTEC, 2002<br />
Otto LNG 3.01 3.01 Kristensen, 2012<br />
GT HFO 0.33 na ENTEC, 2002<br />
STM HFO 0.33 na ENTEC, 2002<br />
NMVOC emissions are also unaffected by the sulphur content of the fuel burned and are the same for HFO<br />
and distillates. For further information on specific emissions factors and references, see Annex 6.<br />
SFOC variability with load<br />
Marine diesel engines have been optimized to work within a designated load range, in which fuel economy<br />
and engine emissions are balanced. Optimizing for fuel economy will lead to higher NO x emissions and<br />
vice versa; MARPOL Annex VI NO x emission Tiers thus indirectly regulate the specific fuel oil consumption<br />
(SFOC) range of the engine. Using an MDO outside the optimum load range (usually 85%–100% MCR) will<br />
lead to higher specific fuel oil consumption per power unit (g/kWh) unless the electronic engine control unit<br />
can adjust the engine accordingly (valve timing, fuel injection). This is possible to achieve with modern smart<br />
engine control units by changing the engine control programming, but for older mechanical set-ups greater<br />
effort may be required from the engine manufacturer. For slow steaming purposes, the optimum working load<br />
range of a diesel engine can be adjusted to be lower than the default load range.