12.02.2016 Views

Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2014

GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report

GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

168 <strong>Third</strong> <strong>IMO</strong> GHG <strong>Study</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />

data sets included: Statcode3, Statcode5, gt, dwt, length, beam, max draught, ship speed, installed main<br />

engine power, engine revolutions per minute (RPM), various cargo capacity fields, date of build, keel laid<br />

date, propulsion type, number of screws, and main engine fuel consumption and stroke type. In addition to<br />

technical data, the IHSF data set includes a ship status field that provides an indication if a ship is active, laid<br />

up, being built, etc. The consortium had access to quarterly IHSF data sets from 2007 to 2012. Each year’s<br />

specific data was utilized for the individual annual estimates.<br />

It should be noted that the data sets do not provide complete coverage for all ships and all fields needed.<br />

In cases where data are missing, values are estimated either from interpolation or from referencing another<br />

publicly available data source. The details of the approach taken for the missing data and the technical and<br />

operational data themselves are further discussed in Section 1.4.3 and in Annex 3.<br />

For auxiliary engine operational profiles, neither IHSF nor the other ship-characteristic data services provide<br />

auxiliary engine or auxiliary boiler utilization data, by ship mode. In the Second <strong>IMO</strong> GHG <strong>Study</strong> 2009,<br />

auxiliary loads were estimated by assuming the number and load of auxiliary engines operated, by ship<br />

class, and basing the rated auxiliary engine power on the limited data provided in IHSF. To improve on this<br />

approach, the consortium used data from Starcrest’s Vessel Boarding Program (VBP) (Starcrest, 2013), which<br />

had been collected at the Port of Los Angeles, the Port of Long Beach, the Port Authority of New York & New<br />

Jersey, the Port of Houston Authority, the Port of Seattle and the Port of Tacoma. The VBP data set includes<br />

over 1,200 ships of various classes. Starcrest has collected data on-board ships for over 15 years specifically<br />

related to estimating emissions from ships and validating its models. Auxiliary load (in kW) are recorded for<br />

at-berth, at-anchorage, manoeuvring, and at-sea ship modes. The ship classes that have been boarded as part<br />

of VBP include:<br />

• bulk carrier<br />

• chemical tanker<br />

• cruise ship<br />

• oil tanker<br />

• general cargo ship<br />

• container ship<br />

• refrigerated cargo ship.<br />

For container and refrigerated cargo ships, ship auxiliary engine and boiler loads (kW), by mode, were<br />

developed based on the VBP data set and averages by ship class and bin size were used. This approach<br />

assumes that the ships boarded are representative of the world fleet for those same classes.<br />

For bulk carriers, chemical tankers, cruise ships, general cargo ships and oil tankers, a hybrid approach was<br />

used combining VBP data, data collected from the Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), and the Second <strong>IMO</strong><br />

GHG <strong>Study</strong> 2009 approach. The prior study’s approach was based on average auxiliary engine rating (kW),<br />

assumption of number of engines running expressed in operational days per year (if greater than 365, it was<br />

assumed that more than one engine was running), a single load factor for each ship class and capacity bins.<br />

The hybrid method was used for ships boarded as part of VBP, but was considered not to be a robust enough<br />

to use on its own. VBP data were used to compare estimated at-berth loads and the ratios between various<br />

modes and to review the results for reasonableness of the estimates. The resulting ship-weighted auxiliary<br />

loads estimated from this approach are presented in Table 6.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!