29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.1. Modulation Instability 121<br />

of ultrashort pulses [8]–[27]. This section discusses modulation instability in optical<br />

fibers as an introduction to soliton theory.<br />

5.1.1 Linear Stability Analysis<br />

Consider propagation of CW light inside an optical fiber. The starting point is the<br />

simplifi<strong>ed</strong> propagation equation (2.3.45). If fiber losses are ignor<strong>ed</strong>, this equation takes<br />

the form<br />

i ∂A<br />

∂z = β 2 ∂ 2 A<br />

2 ∂T 2 − γ|A|2 A, (5.1.1)<br />

and is referr<strong>ed</strong> to as the nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation in the soliton literature.<br />

As discuss<strong>ed</strong> in Section 2.3, A(z,T ) represents the amplitude of the field envelope, β 2<br />

is the GVD parameter, and the nonlinear parameter γ is responsible for SPM. In the<br />

case of CW radiation, the amplitude A is independent of T at the input end of the fiber<br />

at z = 0. Assuming that A(z,T ) remains time independent during propagation inside<br />

the fiber, Eq. (5.1.1) is readily solv<strong>ed</strong> to obtain the steady-state solution<br />

Ā = √ P 0 exp(iφ NL ), (5.1.2)<br />

where P 0 is the incident power and φ NL = γP 0 z is the nonlinear phase shift induc<strong>ed</strong><br />

by SPM. Equation (5.1.2) implies that CW light should propagate through the fiber<br />

unchang<strong>ed</strong> except for acquiring a power-dependent phase shift (and for r<strong>ed</strong>uction in<br />

power in the presence of fiber losses).<br />

Before reaching this conclusion, however, we must ask whether the steady-state solution<br />

(5.1.2) is stable against small perturbations. To answer this question, we perturb<br />

the steady state slightly such that<br />

A =( √ P 0 + a)exp(iφ NL ) (5.1.3)<br />

and examine evolution of the perturbation a(z,T ) using a linear stability analysis. Substituting<br />

Eq. (5.1.3) in Eq. (5.1.1) and linearizing in a, we obtain<br />

i ∂a<br />

∂z = β 2 ∂ 2 a<br />

2 ∂T 2 − γP 0(a + a ∗ ). (5.1.4)<br />

This linear equation can be solv<strong>ed</strong> easily in the frequency domain. However, because<br />

of the a ∗ term, the Fourier components at frequencies Ω and −Ω are coupl<strong>ed</strong>. Thus,<br />

we should consider its solution in the form<br />

a(z,T )=a 1 exp[i(Kz− ΩT )] + a 2 exp[−i(Kz− ΩT )], (5.1.5)<br />

where K and Ω are the wave number and the frequency of perturbation, respectively.<br />

Equations (5.1.4) and (5.1.5) provide a set of two homogeneous equations for a 1 and a 2 .<br />

This set has a nontrivial solution only when K and Ω satisfy the following dispersion<br />

relation<br />

K = ± 1 2 |β 2Ω|[Ω 2 + sgn(β 2 )Ω 2 c] 1/2 , (5.1.6)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!