29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

256 Chapter 7. Cross-Phase Modulation<br />

where P 0 and P 20 represent the peak powers of the pump and probe pulses at z = 0.<br />

The Pauli spin vector σ is defin<strong>ed</strong> using the unit vectors ê j in the Stokes space as<br />

σ = σ 1 ê 1 +σ 2 ê 2 +σ 3 ê 3 , where the three Pauli matrices are given in Eq. (6.6.8). Using<br />

Eqs. (7.6.7) through (7.6.9), the two Stokes vectors are found to satisfy [107]<br />

∂ p<br />

∂ξ + μ ∂ p<br />

∂τ = 2 3 p 3 × p, (7.6.10)<br />

∂ s<br />

∂ξ = −4ω 2<br />

3ω 1<br />

(p − p 3 ) × s, (7.6.11)<br />

where ξ = z/L NL is the distance normaliz<strong>ed</strong> to the nonlinear length L NL =(γ 1 P 0 ) −1 ,<br />

μ = L NL /L W , and p 3 =(p·ê 3 )ê 3 is the third component of the Stokes vector p. Whenever<br />

p 3 = 0, p lies entirely in the equatorial plane of the Poincaré sphere, and the pump<br />

field is linearly polariz<strong>ed</strong>. In deriving Eqs. (7.6.10) and (7.6.11), we made use of the<br />

following identities [109]<br />

|A〉〈A| = 1 2 [I + 〈A|σ|A〉·σ], (7.6.12)<br />

|A ∗ 〉〈A ∗ | = |A〉〈A|−〈A|σ 3 |A〉σ 3 , (7.6.13)<br />

σ(a · σ) =aI + ia × σ, (7.6.14)<br />

where I is an identity matrix and a is an arbitrary Stokes vector.<br />

The pump equation (7.6.10) is relatively easy to solve and has the solution<br />

p(ξ ,τ)=exp[(2ξ /3)p 3 (0,τ − μξ)×]p(0,τ − μξ), (7.6.15)<br />

where exp(a×) is an operator interpret<strong>ed</strong> in terms of a series expansion [109]. Physically<br />

speaking, the Stokes vector p rotates on the Poincaré sphere along the vertical<br />

axis at a rate 2p 3 /3. As discuss<strong>ed</strong> in Section 6.3, this rotation is due to XPM-induc<strong>ed</strong><br />

nonlinear birefringence and is known as the nonlinear polarization rotation. If the pump<br />

is linearly or circularly polariz<strong>ed</strong> initially, its SOP does not change along the fiber. For<br />

an elliptically polariz<strong>ed</strong> pump, the SOP changes as the pump pulse propagates through<br />

the fiber. Moreover, as the rotation rate depends on the optical power, different parts<br />

of the pump pulse acquire different SOPs. Such intrapulse polarization effects have a<br />

profound effect on the probe evolution.<br />

The probe equation (7.6.11) shows that the pump rotates the probe’s Stokes vector<br />

around p − p 3 , a vector that lies in the equatorial plane of the Poincaré sphere. As a<br />

result, if the pump is circularly polariz<strong>ed</strong> initially, XPM effect becomes polarization<br />

independent since p − p 3 = 0. On the other hand, if the pump is linearly polariz<strong>ed</strong>,<br />

p 3 = 0, and p remains fix<strong>ed</strong> in the Stokes space. However, even though the pump SOP<br />

does not change in this case, the probe SOP can still change through XPM. Moreover,<br />

XPM produces different SOPs for different parts of the probe pulse depending on the<br />

local pump power, resulting in nonuniform polarization along the probe pulse profile.<br />

The XPM-induc<strong>ed</strong> polarization effects become quite complicat<strong>ed</strong> when the pump is<br />

elliptically polariz<strong>ed</strong> because the pump SOP itself changes along the fiber.<br />

As an example, consider the case in which the pump pulse is elliptically polariz<strong>ed</strong><br />

but the probe pulse is linearly polariz<strong>ed</strong> at the input end. Assuming a Gaussian shape

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!