29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

180 Chapter 6. Polarization Effects<br />

6.1.2 Coupl<strong>ed</strong>-Mode Equations<br />

The propagation equations governing evolution of the two polarization components<br />

along a fiber can be obtain<strong>ed</strong> following the method of Section 2.3. Assuming that the<br />

nonlinear effects do not affect the fiber mode significantly, the transverse dependence<br />

of E x and E y can be factor<strong>ed</strong> out using<br />

E j (r,t)=F(x,y)A j (z,t)exp(iβ 0 j z), (6.1.10)<br />

where F(x,y) is the spatial distribution of the single mode support<strong>ed</strong> by the fiber,<br />

A j (z,t) is the slowly varying amplitude, and β 0 j is the corresponding propagation<br />

constant ( j = x,y). The dispersive effects are includ<strong>ed</strong> by expanding the frequencydependent<br />

propagation constant in a manner similar to Eq. (2.3.23). The slowly varying<br />

amplitudes, A x and A y , are found to satisfy the following set of two coupl<strong>ed</strong>-mode<br />

equations:<br />

∂A x<br />

∂z + β ∂A x<br />

1x + iβ 2 ∂ 2 A x<br />

∂t 2 ∂t 2 + α 2 A x<br />

= iγ<br />

(|A x | 2 + 2 )<br />

3 |A y| 2 A x + iγ 3 A∗ xA 2 y exp(−2iΔβz), (6.1.11)<br />

∂A y<br />

∂z + β ∂A y<br />

1y + iβ 2 ∂ 2 A y<br />

∂t 2 ∂t 2 + α 2 A y<br />

= iγ<br />

(|A y | 2 + 2 )<br />

3 |A x| 2 A y + iγ 3 A∗ yA 2 x exp(2iΔβz), (6.1.12)<br />

where<br />

Δβ = β 0x − β 0y =(2π/λ)B m = 2π/L B (6.1.13)<br />

is relat<strong>ed</strong> to the linear birefringence of the fiber. The linear or modal birefringence leads<br />

to different group velocities for the two polarization components because β 1x ≠ β 1y<br />

in general. In contrast, the parameters β 2 and γ are the same for both polarization<br />

components because they have the same wavelength λ.<br />

The last term in Eqs. (6.1.11) and (6.1.12) is due to coherent coupling between the<br />

two polarization components and leads to degenerate four-wave mixing. Its importance<br />

to the process of polarization evolution depends on the extent to which the phasematching<br />

condition is satisfi<strong>ed</strong> (see Chapter 10). If the fiber length L ≫ L B , the last<br />

term in Eqs. (6.1.11) and (6.1.12) changes sign often and its contribution averages out<br />

to zero. In highly birefringent fibers (L B ∼ 1 cm typically), the four-wave-mixing term<br />

can often be neglect<strong>ed</strong> for this reason. In contrast, this term should be retain<strong>ed</strong> for<br />

weakly birefringent fibers, especially those with short lengths. In that case, it is often<br />

convenient to rewrite Eqs. (6.1.11) and (6.1.12) using circularly polariz<strong>ed</strong> components<br />

defin<strong>ed</strong> as<br />

A + =(Ā x + iĀ y )/ √ 2, A − =(Ā x − iĀ y )/ √ 2, (6.1.14)<br />

where Ā x = A x exp(iΔβz/2) and Ā y = A y exp(−iΔβz/2). The variables A + and A − represent<br />

right- and left-hand<strong>ed</strong> circularly polariz<strong>ed</strong> (often denot<strong>ed</strong> as σ + and σ − ) states,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!