29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

228 Chapter 7. Cross-Phase Modulation<br />

and combining it with the linear part so that the total induc<strong>ed</strong> polarization is given by<br />

where<br />

P(ω j )=ε 0 ε j E j , (7.1.8)<br />

ε j = ε L j + ε NL<br />

j =(n L j + Δn j ) 2 , (7.1.9)<br />

n L j is the linear part of the refractive index and Δn j is the change induc<strong>ed</strong> by the thirdorder<br />

nonlinear effects. With the approximation Δn j ≪ n L j , the nonlinear part of the<br />

refractive index is given by ( j = 1,2)<br />

Δn j ≈ ε NL<br />

j /2n L j ≈ n 2 (|E j | 2 + 2|E 3− j | 2 ), (7.1.10)<br />

where the nonlinear parameter n 2 is defin<strong>ed</strong> in Eq. (2.3.13).<br />

Equation (7.1.10) shows that the refractive index seen by an optical field inside an<br />

optical fiber depends not only on the intensity of that field but also on the intensity of<br />

other copropagating fields [2]–[4]. As the optical field propagates inside the fiber, it<br />

acquires an intensity-dependent nonlinear phase shift<br />

φ NL<br />

j (z)=(ω j /c)Δn j z = n 2 (ω j /c)(|E j | 2 + 2|E 3− j | 2 )z, (7.1.11)<br />

where j = 1 or 2. The first term is responsible for SPM discuss<strong>ed</strong> in Chapter 4. The<br />

second term results from phase modulation of one wave by the copropagating wave<br />

and is responsible for XPM. The factor of 2 on the right-hand side of Eq. (7.1.11)<br />

shows that XPM is twice as effective as SPM for the same intensity [1]. Its origin<br />

can be trac<strong>ed</strong> back to the number of terms that contribute to the triple sum impli<strong>ed</strong> in<br />

Eq. (2.3.6). Qualitatively speaking, the number of terms doubles when the two optical<br />

frequencies are distinct compar<strong>ed</strong> with that when the frequencies are degenerate. The<br />

XPM-induc<strong>ed</strong> phase shift in optical fibers was measur<strong>ed</strong> as early as 1984 by injecting<br />

two continuous-wave (CW) beams into a 15-km-long fiber [3]. Soon after, picosecond<br />

pulses were us<strong>ed</strong> to observe the XPM-induc<strong>ed</strong> spectral changes [4]–[6].<br />

7.1.2 Coupl<strong>ed</strong> NLS Equations<br />

The pulse-propagation equations for the two optical fields can be obtain<strong>ed</strong> by following<br />

the proc<strong>ed</strong>ure of Section 2.3. Assuming that the nonlinear effects do not affect significantly<br />

the fiber modes, the transverse dependence can be factor<strong>ed</strong> out writing E j (r,t)<br />

in the form<br />

E j (r,t)=F j (x,y)A j (z,t)exp(iβ 0 j z), (7.1.12)<br />

where F j (x,y) is the transverse distribution of the fiber mode for the jth field ( j =<br />

1,2), A j (z,t) is the slowly varying amplitude, and β 0 j is the corresponding propagation<br />

constant at the carrier frequency ω j . The dispersive effects are includ<strong>ed</strong> by expanding<br />

the frequency-dependent propagation constant β j (ω) for each wave in a way similar<br />

to Eq. (2.3.23) and retaining only up to the quadratic term. The resulting propagation<br />

equation for A j (z,t) becomes<br />

∂A j<br />

∂z + β ∂A j<br />

1 j + iβ 2 j ∂ 2 A j<br />

∂t 2 ∂t 2 + α j<br />

2 A j = in 2ω j<br />

( f jj |A j | 2 + 2 f jk |A k | 2 ), (7.1.13)<br />

c

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!