29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10.3. Phase-Matching Techniques 381<br />

Figure 10.6: Variation of FWM-generat<strong>ed</strong> power at the output of a 3.5-km-long fiber with (a)<br />

input power P 3 and (b) frequency separation. (After Ref. [25]; c○1987 IEEE.)<br />

In part (a), f 3 − f 1 = 11 GHz, f 2 − f 1 = 17.2 GHz, P 1 = 0.43 mW, P 2 = 0.14 mW, and<br />

P 3 is vari<strong>ed</strong> from 0.15 to 0.60 mW. In part (b), f 3 − f 2 is vari<strong>ed</strong> from 10 to 25 GHz for<br />

P 3 = 0.55 mW, while keeping all other parameters the same.<br />

The generat<strong>ed</strong> power P 4 varies with P 3 linearly for the frequency component f 231<br />

but quadratically for the frequency component f 332 . This is expect<strong>ed</strong> from the theory of<br />

Section 10.2 by noting that f 231 results from nondegenerate pump waves but the pump<br />

waves are degenerate in frequency for f 332 . More power is generat<strong>ed</strong> in the frequency<br />

component f 231 because f 231 and f 321 are degenerate, and the measur<strong>ed</strong> power is the<br />

sum of powers generat<strong>ed</strong> through two FWM processes. Finally, P 4 decreases with<br />

increasing frequency separation because of a larger phase mismatch. A noteworthy<br />

feature of Figure 10.6 is that up to 0.5 nW of power is generat<strong>ed</strong> for input powers<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!