29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

238 Chapter 7. Cross-Phase Modulation<br />

provid<strong>ed</strong> frequency shifts are such that Ω j =(β 2 j v gj ) −1 and λ j = K j − δ 2 j /(2d j).<br />

For the central j = 0 component, d 0 = γ 0 = 1. In the absence of XPM terms, this<br />

component has the standard soliton solution U 0 (x)=sech(τ). We assume that, in the<br />

presence of XPM, all components have the same “sech” shape but different amplitudes,<br />

i.e., U n (τ) =a n sech(τ). Substituting this solution in Eq. (7.3.24), the amplitudes a n<br />

are found to satisfy the following set of algebraic equations:<br />

a 2 0 + σ ∑ γ n a 2 n = 1,<br />

n≠0<br />

γ n a 2 n + σ ∑ γ m a 2 m = d n . (7.3.25)<br />

m≠n<br />

As long as parameters d n and γ n are close to 1 for all components, this solution describes<br />

a vector soliton with N components of nearly equal intensity. In the degenerate<br />

case, d n = γ n = 1, the amplitudes can be found analytically [45] in the form<br />

U n =[1 + σ(N − 1)] −1/2 , where N is the total number of components. The stability of<br />

any multicomponent vector soliton is not guarante<strong>ed</strong> and should be studi<strong>ed</strong> carefully.<br />

We refer to Ref. [52] for a detail<strong>ed</strong> discussion of the stability issue.<br />

7.4 Spectral and Temporal Effects<br />

This section considers the spectral and temporal changes occurring as a result of XPM<br />

interaction between two copropagating pulses with nonoverlapping spectra [53]–[59].<br />

For simplicity, the polarization effects are ignor<strong>ed</strong> assuming that the input beams preserve<br />

their polarization during propagation. Equations (7.1.15) and (7.1.16) then govern<br />

evolution of two pulses along the fiber length and include the effects of groupvelocity<br />

mismatch, GVD, SPM, and XPM. If fiber losses are neglect<strong>ed</strong> for simplicity,<br />

these equations become<br />

where<br />

∂A 1<br />

∂z + iβ 21 ∂ 2 A 1<br />

2 ∂T 2 = iγ 1(|A 1 | 2 + 2|A 2 | 2 )A 1 , (7.4.1)<br />

∂A 2<br />

∂z + d ∂A 2<br />

∂T + iβ 22 ∂ 2 A 2<br />

2 ∂T 2 = iγ 2(|A 2 | 2 + 2|A 1 | 2 )A 2 , (7.4.2)<br />

T = t − z<br />

v g1<br />

,<br />

d = v g1 − v g2<br />

v g1 v g2<br />

. (7.4.3)<br />

Time T is measur<strong>ed</strong> in a reference frame moving with the pulse traveling at spe<strong>ed</strong> v g1 .<br />

The parameter d is a measure of group-velocity mismatch between the two pulses.<br />

In general, two pulses can have different widths. Using the width T 0 of the first<br />

pulse at the wavelength λ 1 as a reference, we introduce the walk-off length L W and the<br />

dispersion length L D as<br />

L W = T 0 /|d|, L D = T 2<br />

0 /|β 21 |. (7.4.4)<br />

Depending on the relative magnitudes of L W , L D , and the fiber length L, the two pulses<br />

can evolve very differently. If L is small compar<strong>ed</strong> to both L W and L D , the dispersive<br />

effects do not play a significant role and can be neglect<strong>ed</strong>. For example, this can occur

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!