29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58 Chapter 3. Group-Velocity Dispersion<br />

broadens monotonically at a rate faster than that of the unchirp<strong>ed</strong> pulse (the dash<strong>ed</strong><br />

curves). The reason is relat<strong>ed</strong> to the fact that the dispersion-induc<strong>ed</strong> chirp adds to the<br />

input chirp because the two contributions have the same sign.<br />

The situation changes dramatically for β 2 C < 0. In this case, the contribution of the<br />

dispersion-induc<strong>ed</strong> chirp is of a kind opposite to that of the input chirp. As seen from<br />

Figure 3.2(b) and Eq. (3.2.20), C 1 becomes zero at a distance ξ = |C|/(1+C 2 ), and the<br />

pulse becomes unchirp<strong>ed</strong>. This is the reason why the pulse width initially decreases in<br />

Figure 3.2(a) and becomes minimum at that distance. The minimum value of the pulse<br />

width depends on the input chirp parameter as<br />

T1 min T 0<br />

=<br />

(1 +C 2 . (3.2.21)<br />

) 1/2<br />

Since C 1 = 0 when the pulse attains its minimum width, it becomes transform-limit<strong>ed</strong><br />

such that Δω 0 T min<br />

1 = 1, where Δω 0 is the input spectral width of the pulse.<br />

3.2.3 Hyperbolic Secant Pulses<br />

Although pulses emitt<strong>ed</strong> from many lasers can be approximat<strong>ed</strong> by a Gaussian shape,<br />

it is necessary to consider other pulse shapes. Of particular interest is the hyperbolic<br />

secant pulse shape that occurs naturally in the context of optical solitons and pulses<br />

emitt<strong>ed</strong> from some mode-lock<strong>ed</strong> lasers. The optical field associat<strong>ed</strong> with such pulses<br />

often takes the form<br />

( ) T<br />

U(0,T )=sech exp<br />

T 0<br />

(− iCT 2<br />

2T 2<br />

0<br />

)<br />

, (3.2.22)<br />

where the chirp parameter C controls the initial chirp similarly to that of Eq. (3.2.15).<br />

The transmitt<strong>ed</strong> field U(z,T ) is obtain<strong>ed</strong> by using Eqs. (3.2.5), (3.2.6), and (3.2.22).<br />

Unfortunately, it is not easy to evaluate the integral in Eq. (3.2.5) in a clos<strong>ed</strong> form for<br />

non-Gaussian pulse shapes. Figure 3.3 shows the intensity and chirp profiles calculat<strong>ed</strong><br />

numerically at z = 2L D and z = 4L D for initially unchirp<strong>ed</strong> pulses (C = 0). A comparison<br />

of Figures 3.1 and 3.3 shows that the qualitative features of dispersion-induc<strong>ed</strong><br />

broadening are nearly identical for the Gaussian and “sech” pulses. The main difference<br />

is that the dispersion-induc<strong>ed</strong> chirp is no longer purely linear across the pulse.<br />

Note that T 0 appearing in Eq. (3.2.22) is not the FWHM but is relat<strong>ed</strong> to it by<br />

T FWHM = 2ln(1 + √ 2)T 0 ≈ 1.763T 0 . (3.2.23)<br />

This relation should be us<strong>ed</strong> if the comparison is made on the basis of FWHM. The<br />

same relation for a Gaussian pulse is given in Eq. (3.2.8).<br />

3.2.4 Super-Gaussian Pulses<br />

So far we have consider<strong>ed</strong> pulse shapes with relatively broad leading and trailing <strong>ed</strong>ges.<br />

As one may expect, dispersion-induc<strong>ed</strong> broadening is sensitive to the steepness of pulse<br />

<strong>ed</strong>ges. In general, a pulse with steeper leading and trailing <strong>ed</strong>ges broadens more rapidly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!