29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.6. Random Birefringence 215<br />

PMD, with values of D p as low as 0.05 ps/ √ km [126]. Because of the √ L dependence,<br />

PMD-induc<strong>ed</strong> pulse broadening is relatively small compar<strong>ed</strong> with the GVD effects. If<br />

we use D p = 0.1 ps/ √ km as a typical value, σ T ∼ 1 ps for fiber lengths ∼100 km and<br />

can be ignor<strong>ed</strong> for pulse widths >10 ps. However, PMD becomes a limiting factor for<br />

lightwave systems design<strong>ed</strong> to operate over long distances at high bit rates.<br />

Several other factors ne<strong>ed</strong> to be consider<strong>ed</strong> in practice. The derivation of Eq. (6.6.1)<br />

assumes that the fiber link has no elements exhibiting polarization-dependent loss or<br />

gain. The presence of polarization-dependent losses along a fiber link can modify the<br />

PMD effects considerably [139]–[146]. Similarly, the effects of second-order PMD<br />

should be consider<strong>ed</strong> for fibers with relatively low values of D p . Such effects have<br />

been studi<strong>ed</strong> and lead to additional distortion of optical pulses [129].<br />

6.6.2 Vector Form of the NLS Equation<br />

As mention<strong>ed</strong> earlier, the polarization state of a pulse in general becomes nonuniform<br />

across the pulse because of random changes in fiber birefringence. At the same time,<br />

PMD leads to pulse broadening. Such effects can be studi<strong>ed</strong> by generalizing the coupl<strong>ed</strong><br />

NLS equations deriv<strong>ed</strong> in Section 6.1, namely Eqs. (6.1.11) and (6.1.12), to the<br />

case in which a fiber exhibits random birefringence changes along its length. It is<br />

more convenient to write these equations in terms of the normaliz<strong>ed</strong> amplitudes u and<br />

v defin<strong>ed</strong> as<br />

√<br />

u = A x γLD e iΔβz/2 √<br />

, v = A y γLD e −iΔβz/2 . (6.6.3)<br />

If we also use soliton units and introduce normaliz<strong>ed</strong> distance and time as<br />

ξ = z/L D , τ =(t − ¯β 1 z)/T 0 , (6.6.4)<br />

where ¯β 1 = 1 2 (β 1x + β 1y ), Eqs. (6.1.11) and (6.1.12) take the form<br />

( ∂u<br />

i<br />

∂ξ + δ ∂u )<br />

+ bu + 1 ∂ 2 (<br />

u<br />

∂τ 2 ∂τ 2 + |u| 2 + 2 )u<br />

3 |v|2 + 1 3 v2 u ∗ = 0, (6.6.5)<br />

( ∂v<br />

i<br />

∂ξ − δ ∂v )<br />

− bv + 1 ∂ 2 (<br />

v<br />

∂τ 2 ∂τ 2 + |v| 2 + 2 )v<br />

3 |u|2 + 1 3 u2 v ∗ = 0, (6.6.6)<br />

where<br />

b = T 0 2(Δβ)<br />

, δ = T 0 d(Δβ)<br />

(6.6.7)<br />

2|β 2 |<br />

|β 2 | dω<br />

Both δ and b vary randomly along the fiber because of random fluctuations in the<br />

birefringence Δβ ≡ β 0x − β 0y .<br />

Equations (6.6.5) and (6.6.6) can be written in a compact form using the Jonesmatrix<br />

formalism. We introduce the Jones vector |U〉 and the Pauli matrices as [130]<br />

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )<br />

u 1 0<br />

0 1<br />

0 −i<br />

|U〉 = , σ<br />

v 1 = , σ<br />

0 −1 2 = , σ<br />

1 0 3 = . (6.6.8)<br />

i 0<br />

In terms of the Jones vector |U〉, the coupl<strong>ed</strong> NLS equations become [148]<br />

i ∂|U〉 (<br />

∂ξ + σ 1 b|U〉 + iδ ∂|U〉 )<br />

+ 1 ∂ 2 |U〉<br />

∂τ 2 ∂τ 2 + s 0 |U〉− 1 3 s 3σ 3 |U〉, (6.6.9)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!