29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.4. Perturbation of Solitons 151<br />

tons can survive in spite of such large energy variations, we include the gain provid<strong>ed</strong><br />

by lump<strong>ed</strong> amplifiers in Eq. (5.4.8) by replacing Γ with a periodic function ˜Γ(ξ ) such<br />

that ˜Γ(ξ )=Γ everywhere except at the location of amplifiers where it changes abruptly.<br />

If we make the transformation<br />

u(ξ ,τ)=exp<br />

(<br />

− 1 ∫ ξ<br />

˜Γ(ξ )dξ<br />

2 0<br />

)<br />

v(ξ ,τ) ≡ a(ξ )v(ξ ,τ), (5.4.15)<br />

where a(ξ ) contains rapid variations and v(ξ ,τ) is a slowly varying function of ξ and<br />

use it in Eq. (5.4.8), v(ξ ,τ) is found to satisfy<br />

i ∂v<br />

∂ξ + 1 ∂ 2 v<br />

2 ∂τ 2 + a2 (ξ )|v| 2 v = 0. (5.4.16)<br />

Note that a(ξ ) is a periodic function of ξ with a period ξ = L A /L D , where L A is the<br />

amplifier spacing. In each period, a(ξ ) ≡ a 0 exp(−Γξ /2) decreases exponentially and<br />

jumps to its initial value a 0 at the end of the period.<br />

The concept of the guiding-center or path-averag<strong>ed</strong> soliton [152] makes use of the<br />

fact that a 2 (ξ ) in Eq. (5.4.16) varies rapidly in a periodic fashion. If the period ξ A ≪ 1,<br />

solitons evolve little over a short distance as compar<strong>ed</strong> with the dispersion length L D .<br />

Over a soliton period, a 2 (ξ ) varies so rapidly that its effects are averag<strong>ed</strong> out, and we<br />

can replace a 2 (ξ ) by its average value over one period. With this approximation, Eq.<br />

(5.4.16) r<strong>ed</strong>uces to the standard NLS equation:<br />

i ∂v<br />

∂ξ + 1 ∂ 2 v<br />

2 ∂τ 2 + 〈a2 (ξ )〉|v| 2 v = 0. (5.4.17)<br />

The practical importance of the averaging concept stems from the fact that Eq. (5.4.17)<br />

describes soliton propagation quite accurately when ξ A ≪ 1 [71]. In practice, this<br />

approximation works reasonably well for values up to ξ A as large as 0.25.<br />

From a practical viewpoint, the input peak power P s of the path-averag<strong>ed</strong> soliton<br />

should be chosen such that 〈a 2 (ξ )〉 = 1 in Eq. (5.4.17). Introducing the amplifier gain<br />

G = exp(Γξ A ), the peak power is given by<br />

P s =<br />

Γξ A P 0<br />

1 − exp(−Γξ A ) = GlnG<br />

G − 1 P 0, (5.4.18)<br />

where P 0 is the peak power in lossless fibers. Thus, soliton evolution in lossy fibers<br />

with periodic lump<strong>ed</strong> amplification is identical to that in lossless fibers provid<strong>ed</strong>: (i)<br />

amplifiers are spac<strong>ed</strong> such that L A ≪ L D ; and (ii) the launch<strong>ed</strong> peak power is larger by<br />

a factor GlnG/(G − 1). As an example, G = 10 and P in ≈ 2.56P 0 for 50-km amplifier<br />

spacing and a fiber loss of 0.2 dB/km.<br />

Figure 5.14 shows pulse evolution in the average-soliton regime over a distance of<br />

10,000 km, assuming solitons are amplifi<strong>ed</strong> every 50 km. When the soliton width corresponds<br />

to a dispersion length of 200 km, the soliton is well preserv<strong>ed</strong> even after 200<br />

lump<strong>ed</strong> amplifiers because the condition ξ A ≪ 1 is reasonably well satisfi<strong>ed</strong>. However,<br />

if the dispersion length r<strong>ed</strong>uces to 25 km, the soliton is destroy<strong>ed</strong> because of relatively<br />

large loss-induc<strong>ed</strong> perturbations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!