29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

202 Chapter 6. Polarization Effects<br />

of birefringence, the phase-matching condition can only be satisfi<strong>ed</strong> if the nonlinear<br />

phase shifts remain below a certain level. This is the origin of the critical power level<br />

in Eq. (6.4.19). An interesting feature of the four-wave-mixing process is that spectral<br />

sidebands are generat<strong>ed</strong> such that the low-frequency sideband at ω 0 − Ω appears along<br />

the slow axis whereas the sideband at ω 0 + Ω is polariz<strong>ed</strong> along the fast axis. This can<br />

also be understood in terms of the phase-matching condition of Section 10.3.3.<br />

6.4.3 Isotropic <strong>Fiber</strong>s<br />

It is clear that modal birefringence of fibers plays an important role for modulation<br />

instability to occur. A natural question is whether modulation instability can occur in<br />

isotropic fibers with no birefringence (n x = n y ). Even though such fibers are hard to<br />

fabricate, fibers with extremely low birefringence (|n x − n y | < 10 −8 ) can be made by<br />

spinning the preform during the drawing stage. The question is also interesting from a<br />

fundamental standpoint and was discuss<strong>ed</strong> as early as 1970 [49].<br />

The theory develop<strong>ed</strong> for high-birefringence fibers cannot be us<strong>ed</strong> in the limit Δβ =<br />

0 because the coherent-coupling term has been neglect<strong>ed</strong>. In contrast, theory develop<strong>ed</strong><br />

for low-birefringence fibers remains valid in that limit. The main difference is that<br />

P cr = 0 as polarization instability does not occur for isotropic fibers. As a result, Ω c2 =<br />

0 while Ω c1 = Ω c3 ≡ Ω c . The gain spectrum of modulation instability in Eq. (6.4.8)<br />

r<strong>ed</strong>uces to<br />

√<br />

g(Ω)=|β 2 Ω| Ω 2 c − Ω 2 , (6.4.20)<br />

irrespective of whether the input beam is polariz<strong>ed</strong> along the slow or fast axis. This is<br />

the same result obtain<strong>ed</strong> in Section 5.1 for the scalar case. It shows that the temporal<br />

and spectral features of modulation instability should not depend on the direction in<br />

which the input beam is linearly polariz<strong>ed</strong>. This is expect<strong>ed</strong> for any isotropic nonlinear<br />

m<strong>ed</strong>ium on physical grounds.<br />

The situation changes when the input beam is circularly or elliptically polariz<strong>ed</strong>.<br />

We can consider this case by setting Δβ = 0 in Eqs. (6.1.15) and (6.1.16). Using<br />

α = 0 for simplicity, these equations r<strong>ed</strong>uce to the following set of two coupl<strong>ed</strong> NLS<br />

equations [49]:<br />

∂A +<br />

∂z + iβ 2 ∂ 2 A +<br />

2 ∂T 2 + ( iγ′ |A + | 2 + 2|A − | 2) A + = 0, (6.4.21)<br />

∂A −<br />

∂z + iβ 2 ∂ 2 A −<br />

2 ∂T 2 + ( iγ′ |A − | 2 + 2|A + | 2) A − = 0, (6.4.22)<br />

where T = t −β 1 z is the r<strong>ed</strong>uc<strong>ed</strong> time and γ ′ = 2γ/3. The steady-state solution of these<br />

equations is obtain<strong>ed</strong> easily and is given by<br />

Ā ± (z)= √ P ± exp(iφ ± ), (6.4.23)<br />

where P ± is the input power in the two circularly polariz<strong>ed</strong> components and φ ± (z)=<br />

γ ′ (P ∓ + 2P ± )z is the nonlinear phase shift.<br />

As before, we perturb the steady-state solution using<br />

A ± (z,t)=[ √ P ± + a ± (z,t)]exp(iφ ± ), (6.4.24)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!