29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10.2. Theory of Four-Wave Mixing 373<br />

The same equation is obtain<strong>ed</strong> for B ∗ 4 . Thus, the general solution of the form [12]<br />

B 3 (z) =(a 3 e gz + b 3 e −gz )exp(−iκz/2), (10.2.17)<br />

B ∗ 4(z) =(a 4 e gz + b 4 e −gz )exp(iκz/2), (10.2.18)<br />

where a 3 , b 3 , a 4 , and b 4 are determin<strong>ed</strong> from the boundary conditions. The parametric<br />

gain g depends on the pump power and is defin<strong>ed</strong> as<br />

√<br />

g = (γP 0 r) 2 − (κ/2) 2 , (10.2.19)<br />

where we have introduc<strong>ed</strong> the parameters r and P 0 as<br />

r = 2(P 1 P 2 ) 1/2 /P 0 , P 0 = P 1 + P 2 . (10.2.20)<br />

The solution given in Eqs. (10.2.17) and (10.2.18) is valid only when the pump<br />

waves remain largely undeplet<strong>ed</strong>. Pump depletion is includ<strong>ed</strong> by solving the complete<br />

set of four equations, Eqs. (10.2.1) through (10.2.4). Such a solution can be written in<br />

terms of elliptic functions [27] but is not discuss<strong>ed</strong> here because of its complexity.<br />

10.2.3 Effect of Phase Matching<br />

The prec<strong>ed</strong>ing derivation of the parametric gain has assum<strong>ed</strong> that the two pumps are<br />

distinct. If the pump fields cannot be distinguish<strong>ed</strong> on the basis of their frequency,<br />

polarization, or spatial mode, the entire proc<strong>ed</strong>ure should be carri<strong>ed</strong> out with only three<br />

terms in Eq. (10.1.2). The parametric gain is still given by Eq. (10.2.19) if we choose<br />

P 1 = P 2 = P 0 /2(r = 1) and use<br />

κ = Δk + 2γP 0 . (10.2.21)<br />

Figure 10.1 shows variations of g with Δk in this specific case for several values of γP 0 .<br />

The maximum gain (g max = γP 0 ) occurs at κ = 0, or at Δk = −2γP 0 . The range over<br />

which the gain exists is given by 0 > Δk > −4γP 0 , as dictat<strong>ed</strong> by Eqs. (10.2.19) and<br />

(10.2.21). The shift of the gain peak from Δk = 0 is due to the contribution of SPM and<br />

XPM to the phase mismatch as apparent from Eq. (10.2.21).<br />

It is useful to compare the peak value of the parametric gain with that of the Raman<br />

gain [7]. From Eq. (10.2.19) the maximum gain is given by (using r = 1)<br />

g max = γP 0 = g P (P 0 /A eff ), (10.2.22)<br />

where γ is us<strong>ed</strong> from Eq. (10.2.7) and g P is defin<strong>ed</strong> as g P = 2πn 2 /λ 1 at the pump<br />

wavelength λ 1 . Using λ 1 = 1 μm and n 2 ≈ 2.7 × 10 −20 m 2 /W, we obtain g P ≈ 1.7 ×<br />

10 −13 m/W. This value should be compar<strong>ed</strong> with the peak value of the Raman gain<br />

g R in Figure 8.1. The parametric gain is larger by about 70% compar<strong>ed</strong> with g R .Asa<br />

result, the pump power for the FWM gain is expect<strong>ed</strong> to be lower than that requir<strong>ed</strong> for<br />

Raman amplification, if phase matching can be realiz<strong>ed</strong>. In practice, SRS dominates<br />

for long fibers because it is difficult to maintain phase matching over long fiber lengths.<br />

We can define a length scale, known as the coherence length, using L coh = 2π/|Δκ|,<br />

where Δκ is the maximum value of the wave-vector mismatch that can be tolerat<strong>ed</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!