29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10.2. Theory of Four-Wave Mixing 371<br />

the fiber together with the pump, the signal is amplifi<strong>ed</strong> while a new idler wave at ω 4<br />

is generat<strong>ed</strong> simultaneously. The gain responsible for such amplification is call<strong>ed</strong> the<br />

parametric gain. In this section, we consider the FWM mixing process in detail and<br />

derive an expression for the parametric gain. The nondegenerate case (ω 1 ≠ ω 2 )is<br />

consider<strong>ed</strong> for generality.<br />

10.2.1 Coupl<strong>ed</strong> Amplitude Equations<br />

The starting point is, as usual, the wave equation (2.3.1) for the total electric field<br />

E(r,t) with P NL given in Eq. (10.1.1). We substitute Eqs. (10.1.2) and (10.1.3) in the<br />

wave equation, together with a similar expression for the linear part of the polarization,<br />

and neglect the time dependence of the field components E j ( j = 1 to 4) assuming<br />

quasi-CW conditions. Their spatial dependence is, however, includ<strong>ed</strong> using E j (r) =<br />

F j (x,y)A j (z), where F j (x,y) is the spatial distribution of the fiber mode in which the<br />

jth field propagates inside the fiber [12]. Integrating over the spatial mode profiles, the<br />

evolution of the amplitude A j (z) inside an optical fiber is govern<strong>ed</strong> by the following set<br />

of four coupl<strong>ed</strong> equations:<br />

dA 1<br />

dz = in [(<br />

2ω 1<br />

f 11 |A 1 | 2 + 2<br />

c<br />

∑ f 1k |A k | 2) A 1 + 2 f 1234 A ∗ 2A 3 A 4 e iΔkz] , (10.2.1)<br />

k≠1<br />

dA 2<br />

dz = in [(<br />

2ω 2<br />

f 22 |A 2 | 2 + 2<br />

c<br />

∑ f 2k |A k | 2) A 2 + 2 f 2134 A ∗ 1A 3 A 4 e iΔkz] , (10.2.2)<br />

k≠2<br />

dA 3<br />

dz = in [(<br />

2ω 3<br />

f 33 |A 3 | 2 + 2<br />

c<br />

∑ f 3k |A k | 2) A 3 + 2 f 3412 A 1 A 2 A ∗ 4e −iΔkz] , (10.2.3)<br />

k≠3<br />

dA 4<br />

dz = in [(<br />

2ω 4<br />

f 44 |A 4 | 2 + 2<br />

c<br />

∑ f 4k |A k | 2) A 4 + 2 f 4312 A 1 A 2 A ∗ 3e −iΔkz] , (10.2.4)<br />

k≠4<br />

where the wave-vector mismatch Δk is given in Eq. (10.1.8). The overlap integral f jk<br />

is defin<strong>ed</strong> in Eq. (7.1.14) of Section 7.1. The new overlap integral f ijkl is given by [12]<br />

f ijkl =<br />

〈Fi ∗F∗<br />

j F kF l 〉<br />

[〈|F i | 2 〉〈|F j | 2 〉〈|F k | 2 〉〈|F l | 2 , (10.2.5)<br />

〉] 1/2<br />

where angle brackets denote integration over the transverse coordinates x and y. In<br />

deriving Eqs. (10.2.1) through (10.2.4), we kept only nearly phase-match<strong>ed</strong> terms and<br />

neglect<strong>ed</strong> frequency dependence of χ (3) . The parameter n 2 is the nonlinear-index coefficient<br />

defin<strong>ed</strong> earlier in Eq. (2.3.13).<br />

10.2.2 Approximate Solution<br />

Equations (10.2.1) through (10.2.4) are quite general in the sense that they include the<br />

effects of SPM, XPM, and pump depletion on the FWM process; a numerical approach<br />

is necessary to solve them exactly. Considerable physical insight is gain<strong>ed</strong> if the pump<br />

waves are assum<strong>ed</strong> to be much more intense than the other waves and to remain undeplet<strong>ed</strong><br />

during the FWM process. As a further simplification, we assume that all overlap

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!