29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

184 Chapter 6. Polarization Effects<br />

Figure 6.1: Schematic illustration of a Kerr shutter. Pump and probe beams are linearly polariz<strong>ed</strong><br />

at 45 ◦ to each other at the input end. Polarizer blocks probe transmission in the absence of pump.<br />

respect to the direction of pump polarization) become slightly different because of<br />

pump-induc<strong>ed</strong> birefringence. The phase difference between the two components at<br />

the fiber output manifests as a change in the probe polarization, and a portion of the<br />

probe intensity is transmitt<strong>ed</strong> through the polarizer. The probe transmissivity depends<br />

on the pump intensity and can be controll<strong>ed</strong> simply by changing it. In particular, a<br />

pulse at the pump wavelength opens the Kerr shutter only during its passage through<br />

the fiber. As the probe output at one wavelength can be modulat<strong>ed</strong> through a pump<br />

at a different wavelength, this device is also referr<strong>ed</strong> to as the Kerr modulator. It has<br />

potential applications in fiber-optical networks requiring all-optical switching.<br />

Equation (6.2.6) cannot be us<strong>ed</strong> to calculate the phase difference between the x and<br />

y components of the probe because the pump and probe beams have different wavelengths<br />

in Kerr shutters. We follow a slightly different approach and neglect fiber<br />

losses for the moment; they can be includ<strong>ed</strong> later by replacing L with L eff . The relative<br />

phase difference for the probe at the output of a fiber of length L can always be written<br />

as<br />

Δφ =(2π/λ)(ñ x − ñ y )L, (6.2.8)<br />

where λ is the probe wavelength and<br />

ñ x = n x + Δn x , ñ y = n y + Δn y . (6.2.9)<br />

As discuss<strong>ed</strong> earlier, the linear parts n x and n y of the refractive indices are different<br />

because of modal birefringence. The nonlinear parts Δn x and Δn y are different because<br />

of pump-induc<strong>ed</strong> birefringence.<br />

Consider the case of a pump polariz<strong>ed</strong> linearly along the x axis. The x component<br />

of the probe is polariz<strong>ed</strong> parallel to the pump but its wavelength is different. For this<br />

reason, the corresponding index change Δn x must be obtain<strong>ed</strong> by using the theory of<br />

Section 7.1. If the SPM contribution is neglect<strong>ed</strong>,<br />

Δn x = 2n 2 |E p | 2 , (6.2.10)<br />

where |E p | 2 is the pump intensity. When the pump and probe are orthogonally polariz<strong>ed</strong>,<br />

only the first term in Eq. (6.1.4) contributes to Δn y because of different wavelengths<br />

of the pump and probe beams [9]. Again neglecting the SPM term, Δn y becomes<br />

Δn y = 2n 2 b|E p | 2 , b = χ xxyy/χ (3)<br />

xxxx. (3)<br />

(6.2.11)<br />

If the origin of χ (3) is purely electronic, b = 1 3<br />

. Combining Eqs. (6.2.8)–(6.2.11), the<br />

phase difference becomes<br />

Δφ ≡ Δφ L + Δφ NL =(2πL/λ)(Δn L + n 2B |E p | 2 ), (6.2.12)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!