29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.3. SRS with Short Pump Pulses 297<br />

remains undetermin<strong>ed</strong>. Numerical solutions of Eqs. (8.3.1) and (8.3.2) show that the<br />

average pulse shapes and spectra at the fiber output are not dramatically affect<strong>ed</strong> by<br />

different choices of the shape of the se<strong>ed</strong> pulse. A simple approximation consists of<br />

assuming<br />

A s (0,T )=(Ps0 eff )1/2 , (8.3.12)<br />

where Ps0<br />

eff is given by Eq. (8.1.10). Alternatively, one may take the se<strong>ed</strong> pulse to be<br />

Gaussian with a peak power Ps0 eff.<br />

As a simple application of the analytic solution (8.3.7), consider the Raman threshold<br />

for SRS induc<strong>ed</strong> by short pump pulses of width T 0 and peak power P 0 [119]. The<br />

peak power of the Raman pulse at the fiber output (z = L) is given by<br />

P s (L)=|A s (L,0)| 2 = P eff<br />

s0 exp(√ πg s P 0 L W ), (8.3.13)<br />

where Eq. (8.3.10) was us<strong>ed</strong> with τ = 0 and L/L W ≫ 1. If we define the Raman<br />

threshold in the same way as for the CW case, the threshold is achiev<strong>ed</strong> when P s (L)=<br />

P 0 . The comparison of Eqs. (8.1.12) and (8.3.13) shows that one can use the CW<br />

criterion provid<strong>ed</strong> the effective length is taken to be<br />

L eff = √ π L W ≈ T FWHM /|d|. (8.3.14)<br />

In particular, Eq. (8.1.13) can be us<strong>ed</strong> to obtain the critical peak power of the pump<br />

pulse if L eff is obtain<strong>ed</strong> from Eq. (8.3.14). This change is expect<strong>ed</strong> because the effective<br />

interaction length between the pump and Raman pulses is determin<strong>ed</strong> by the length<br />

L W —SRS ceases to occur when the two pulses move apart enough that they stop overlapping<br />

significantly. Equations (8.1.13) and (8.3.14) show that the Raman threshold<br />

depends on the width of the pump pulse and increases inversely with T FWHM . For pulse<br />

widths ∼10 ps (L W ∼ 1 m), the threshold pump powers are ∼100 W.<br />

The analytic solution (8.3.7) can be us<strong>ed</strong> to obtain both the shape and the spectrum<br />

of the Raman pulse during the initial stages of SRS [124]. The spectral evolution is<br />

govern<strong>ed</strong> by the XPM-induc<strong>ed</strong> frequency chirp. The chirp behavior has been discuss<strong>ed</strong><br />

in Section 7.4 in the context of XPM-induc<strong>ed</strong> asymmetric spectral broadening (see<br />

Figure 7.3). The qualitative features of the XPM-induc<strong>ed</strong> chirp are identical to those<br />

shown there as long as the pump remains undeplet<strong>ed</strong>. Note, however, that the Raman<br />

pulse travels faster than the pump pulse in the normal-GVD regime. As a result, chirp<br />

is induc<strong>ed</strong> mainly near the trailing <strong>ed</strong>ge. It should be stress<strong>ed</strong> that both pulse shapes<br />

and spectra are considerably modifi<strong>ed</strong> when pump depletion is includ<strong>ed</strong> [121]. As the<br />

energy of the Raman pulse grows, it affects itself through SPM and the pump pulse<br />

through XPM.<br />

8.3.3 Effects of GVD<br />

When the fiber length is comparable to the dispersion length L D , it is important to include<br />

the GVD effects. Such effects cannot be describ<strong>ed</strong> analytically, and a numerical<br />

solution of Eqs. (8.3.1) and (8.3.2) is necessary to understand the SRS evolution. A<br />

generalization of the split-step Fourier method of Section 2.4 can be us<strong>ed</strong> for this purpose.<br />

The method requires specification of the Raman pulse at the fiber input by using<br />

Eq. (8.1.10).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!