29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

46 Chapter 2. Pulse Propagation in <strong>Fiber</strong>s<br />

polarization effects are completely ignor<strong>ed</strong>. As was seen in Section 1.2.4, optical fibers<br />

exhibit birefringence. The inclusion of the birefringence effects requires consideration<br />

of all components of electric and magnetic field vectors.<br />

In the case of a linear m<strong>ed</strong>ium, the algorithms that solve Maxwell’s equations, Eqs.<br />

(2.1.1) through (2.1.4), directly in the time domain by using finite-difference methods<br />

have been develop<strong>ed</strong> for many years [102]–[104]. Such algorithms have been extend<strong>ed</strong><br />

to the case of nonlinear m<strong>ed</strong>ia [105]–[109]. In a 1992 approach [105], the delay<strong>ed</strong><br />

nature of nonlinear response was incorporat<strong>ed</strong> by using Eqs. (2.3.32) and (2.3.38) together<br />

with the functional form of the Raman response function given in Eq. (2.3.40).<br />

This work includ<strong>ed</strong> the dispersive effects through a single resonance frequency. In an<br />

extension of this approach [109], dispersive effects were includ<strong>ed</strong> through the Sellmeier<br />

equation given in Eq. (1.2.6) with three resonance frequencies (m = 3). Conceptually,<br />

the main difference between the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method and the<br />

split-step Fourier method is that the former deals with all electromagnetic components<br />

without eliminating the carrier frequency ω 0 , in contrast with what was done in Section<br />

2.3 in deriving the NLS equation. For this reason, the FDTD method can be us<strong>ed</strong> for<br />

pulses of arbitrary durations (as short as a single optical cycle).<br />

The FDTD method is certainly more accurate because it solves Maxwell’s equations<br />

directly with a minimum number of approximations. However, improvement in<br />

accuracy is achiev<strong>ed</strong> only at the expense of a vast increase in the computational effort.<br />

This can be understood by noting that the time step ne<strong>ed</strong><strong>ed</strong> to resolve the optical carrier<br />

is by necessity a fraction of the optical period and should often be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!