29.03.2016 Views

Nonlinear Fiber Optics - 4 ed. Agrawal

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

402 Chapter 10. Four-Wave Mixing<br />

in the following analysis. As before, we neglect pump depletion assuming that pump<br />

powers are much larger than the signal and idler powers.<br />

In general, one should consider the general form of the nonlinear polarization given<br />

in Eq. (8.5.1) so that the Raman contribution is properly includ<strong>ed</strong>. To simplify the following<br />

discussion, we ignore the Raman effects and assume that the nonlinear polarization<br />

is given by Eq. (10.1.1). The tensor χ (3) in this equation has the form of Eq.<br />

(6.1.2) and can be written as<br />

χ (3)<br />

ijkl = 1 3 χ(3) xxxx(<br />

δij δ kl + δ ik δ jl + δ il δ jk<br />

)<br />

. (10.5.1)<br />

In the case of nondegenerate FWM, the total electric field and the nonlinear polarization<br />

can be decompos<strong>ed</strong> as<br />

[ 4 ]<br />

[ 4 ]<br />

E = Re ∑ E j exp(−iω j t) , P NL = Re ∑ P j exp(−iω j t) , (10.5.2)<br />

j=1<br />

j=1<br />

where Re stands for the real part and E j is the slowly varying amplitude at the frequency<br />

ω j .<br />

We now follow the proc<strong>ed</strong>ure outlin<strong>ed</strong> in Section 8.5.1 and substitute Eq. (10.5.2)<br />

in Eq. (10.1.1). Collecting the terms oscillating at ω 1 and ω 2 , the nonlinear polarization<br />

at the pump frequencies is found to be<br />

P j (ω j )= ε 0<br />

4 χ(3) xxxx[<br />

(E j · E j )E ∗ j + 2(E ∗ j · E j )E j<br />

+ 2(E ∗ m · E m )E j + 2(E m · E j )E ∗ m + 2(E ∗ m · E j )E m<br />

]<br />

, (10.5.3)<br />

where j,m = 1 or 2 with j ≠ m. Using the same process, the nonlinear polarization at<br />

the signal and idler frequencies is found to be<br />

P j (ω j )= ε 0<br />

2 χ(3) xxxx[<br />

(E ∗ 1 · E 1 )E j +(E 1 · E j )E ∗ 1 +(E ∗ 1 · E j )E 1<br />

+(E ∗ 2 · E 2 )E j +(E 2 · E j )E ∗ 2 +(E ∗ 2 · E j )E 2<br />

+(E ∗ m · E 1 )E 2 +(E ∗ m · E 2 )E 1 +(E 1 · E 2 )E ∗ m]<br />

, (10.5.4)<br />

where j,m = 3 or 4 with j ≠ m. In Eqs. (10.5.3) and (10.5.4), the SPM and XPM effects<br />

induc<strong>ed</strong> by the two pumps are includ<strong>ed</strong> but those induc<strong>ed</strong> by the signal and idler waves<br />

are neglect<strong>ed</strong> because of their relatively low power levels.<br />

To account for the polarization changes, we represent each field in terms of its Jones<br />

vector |A j (z)〉 and use<br />

E j (r)=F j (x,y)|A j 〉exp(iβ j z), (10.5.5)<br />

where F j (x,y) represents the fiber-mode profile and β j is the propagation constant for<br />

the field at frequency ω j . As in Section 10.2.1, we assume that mode profiles are<br />

nearly the same for the four fields. This approximation amounts to assuming the same<br />

effective mode area for the four waves.<br />

Using Eqs. (10.5.3) through (10.5.5) in the wave equation (2.3.1) and following the<br />

proc<strong>ed</strong>ure of Section 2.3.1, the Jones vectors of the four fields are found to satisfy the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!