10.12.2012 Views

Low Impact Development Manual for Michigan - OSEH - University ...

Low Impact Development Manual for Michigan - OSEH - University ...

Low Impact Development Manual for Michigan - OSEH - University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

such as pathways through woodlands. In summary,<br />

even when used <strong>for</strong> stormwater management, berms<br />

can be designed to serve multifunctional purposes and<br />

are easily incorporated into the landscape.<br />

Design Considerations<br />

The following general design considerations are <strong>for</strong><br />

all BMPs utilizing infiltration. These include: site<br />

conditions and constraints, as well as general design<br />

considerations. Specific design considerations <strong>for</strong> each<br />

BMP follow these same considerations.<br />

Site conditions and constraints <strong>for</strong> all<br />

infiltration BMPs<br />

• Depth to seasonal high water table. A four-foot<br />

clearance above the seasonally high water table is<br />

recommended. A two-foot clearance can be used,<br />

but may reduce the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the BMP. This<br />

reduces the likelihood that temporary groundwater<br />

mounding will affect the system, and allows sufficient<br />

distance of water movement through the soil to assure<br />

adequate pollutant removal. In special circumstances,<br />

filter media may be employed to remove pollutants if<br />

adequate soil layers do not exist.<br />

• Depth to bedrock. A four-foot minimum depth<br />

to bedrock is recommended to assure adequate<br />

pollutant removal and infiltration. A two-foot depth<br />

can be used, but may reduce the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the<br />

BMP. In special circumstances, filter media may<br />

be employed to remove pollutants if adequate soil<br />

mantle does not exist.<br />

• Soil infiltration. Soils underlying infiltration<br />

devices should have infiltration rates between 0.1<br />

and 10 inches per hour, which in most development<br />

programs should result in reasonably sized infiltration<br />

systems. Where soil permeability is extremely low,<br />

infiltration may still be possible, but the surface area<br />

required could be large, and other volume reduction<br />

methods may be warranted. Undisturbed Hydrologic<br />

Soil Groups A, B, and C often fall within this range<br />

and cover most of the state. Type D soils may require<br />

the use of an underdrain.<br />

Soils with rates in excess of six inches per hour<br />

may require an additional soil buffer (such as an<br />

organic layer over the bed bottom) if the Cation<br />

Exchange Capacity (CEC) is less than 10 and<br />

pollutant loading is expected to be significant.<br />

In carbonate soils, excessively rapid drainage<br />

may increase the risk of sinkhole <strong>for</strong>mation, and<br />

some compaction or additional measures may be<br />

appropriate.<br />

• Setbacks. Infiltration BMPs should be sited so that<br />

any risk to groundwater quality is minimized and<br />

they present no threat to sub-surface structures such<br />

as foundations and septic systems. (Table 7.11)<br />

Table 7.11<br />

Setback Distances<br />

Setback from Minimum Distance (feet)<br />

Property Line 10<br />

Building Foundation* 10<br />

Private Well 50<br />

Public Water Supply Well** 50<br />

Septic System Drainfield*** 100<br />

* minimum with slopes directed away from building. 100 feet<br />

upgradient from basement foundations.<br />

** At least 200 feet from Type I or IIa wells, 75 feet from Type IIb<br />

and III wells (MDEQ Safe Drinking Water Act, PA 399)<br />

*** 50 feet <strong>for</strong> septic systems with a design flow of less than 1,000<br />

gallons per day<br />

General design considerations <strong>for</strong> all<br />

infiltration BMPs<br />

• Do not infiltrate in compacted fill. Infiltration<br />

in native soil without prior fill or disturbance is<br />

preferred but not always possible. Areas that have<br />

experienced historic disturbance or fill are suitable<br />

<strong>for</strong> infiltration provided sufficient time has elapsed<br />

and the soil testing indicates the infiltration is<br />

feasible. In disturbed areas it may be necessary<br />

to infiltrate at a depth that is beneath soils that<br />

have previously been compacted by construction<br />

methods or long periods of mowing, often 18<br />

inches or more. If site grading requires placement<br />

of an infiltration BMP on fill, compaction should<br />

be minimal to prevent excess settlement and the<br />

infiltration capacity of the compacted fill should be<br />

measured in the field to ensure the design values<br />

used are valid.<br />

• A level infiltration area (one percent or less<br />

slope) is preferred. Bed bottoms should always be<br />

graded into the existing soil mantle, with terracing<br />

as required to construct flat structures. Sloped<br />

bottoms tend to pool and concentrate water in<br />

small areas, reducing the overall rate of infiltration<br />

and longevity of the BMP. The longitudinal slope<br />

may range only from the preferred zero percent<br />

up to one percent, and that lateral slopes are held<br />

at zero percent. It is highly recommended that the<br />

maximum side slopes <strong>for</strong> an infiltration practice be<br />

1:3 (V: H).<br />

LID <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Michigan</strong> – Chapter 7 Page 201

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!