Low Impact Development Manual for Michigan - OSEH - University ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bioretention Inspection Checklist* Project Location: ______________________________________________________________________________ Date/Time: __________________________________________________________________________________ Inspector: ____________________________________________________________________________________ Maintenance Item Inlet/Outlet Satisfactory/ Unsatisfactory Recommended Inspection Frequency Structural integrity of inlet/outlet A Inlet/outlet clear of debris M Overflow spillway or catch basin clear of debris M Erosion control at inlet in place (e.g., rock, mat)/ evidence of erosion A Erosion control at outlet in place/evidence of erosion A Inspect/clean catch basin upstream of BMP Every 5 years Inspection frequency key — A = Annual, M = Monthly, S = After major storm *Prior to field inspection, it is recommended to review the as-built plans. Comments Pretreatment for sediment (Generally consists of catch basin or velocity dissapator at inlet such as area of riprap/ collection for sediment) Device functioning to trap sediment A Remove accumulated sediment A Overall functionality Ensure bioretention area is functioning properly (professional civil engineer is recommended) Bioretention area surface Any evidence of sedimentation in BMP A Does sediment accumulation currently require removal Debris in BMP M Evidence of erosion present A Does good vegetative cover exist A Mulch covers entire area (no voids) and to specified thickness Optional considerations Inspect BMP for invasive species. A LID Manual for Michigan – Appendix F Page 450 A A A
Maintenance Item Qualified professional applicator selectively herbicide invasive species Increase plant diversity by planting additional vegetation Satisfactory/ Unsatisfactory Recommended Inspection Frequency Complaints from residents (note on back) A Inspection frequency key — A = Annual, M = Monthly, S = After major storm *Prior to field inspection, it is recommended to review the as-built plans. Comments Summary Inspector’s remarks: __________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Overall condition of facility (acceptable or unacceptable): ____________________________________________ Dates any maintenance must be completed by: _____________________________________________________ LID Manual for Michigan – Appendix F Page 451 A A
Page 1:
A Design Guide for Implementers and
Page 4 and 5:
LID Manual for Michigan Page ii
Page 6 and 7:
Shawn Keenan, City of Auburn Hills
Page 8 and 9:
Appendix G: Stormwater Management P
Page 10 and 11:
Figure 7.18 Filter with infiltratio
Page 12 and 13:
Table 7.9 Definitions of Wetland Ve
Page 14 and 15:
How this manual is organized This m
Page 16 and 17:
discuss a new development. The staf
Page 18 and 19:
In a natural woodland or meadow in
Page 20 and 21:
Almost all components of the urban
Page 22 and 23:
Benefits of implementing LID Implem
Page 24 and 25:
Table 2.2 Summary of Cost Compariso
Page 26 and 27:
Getting started with LID LID can be
Page 28 and 29:
Precipitation also varies slightly
Page 30 and 31:
Figure 3.4 Soil Freezing in Lower M
Page 32 and 33:
Figure 3.6 Michigan Surficial Geolo
Page 34 and 35:
Most soils in Michigan are classifi
Page 36 and 37:
Table 3.3 Representative Cation Exc
Page 38 and 39:
There is currently no single broadl
Page 40 and 41:
Wellhead protection areas/ public w
Page 42 and 43:
Table 3.4 Michigan Rivers and Strea
Page 44 and 45:
References * Bailey, R.M and G.R. S
Page 46 and 47:
LID Manual for Michigan - Chapter 3
Page 48 and 49:
Following are sample goals and poli
Page 50 and 51:
Develop regulations that encourage/
Page 52 and 53:
Construction activity • Minimize
Page 54 and 55:
Street sweeping in Bloomfield Towns
Page 56 and 57:
Resistance from internal sources an
Page 58 and 59:
Site constraints that may pose chal
Page 60 and 61:
Entity Stormwater Jurisdiction Coun
Page 62 and 63:
Step 1: Property acquisition and us
Page 64 and 65:
can be incorporated into the develo
Page 66 and 67:
Step 3: Integrate municipal, county
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
BMP Selection Process This chapter
Page 72 and 73:
Case Study: Title The second page o
Page 74 and 75:
Case Study: Pokagon Band of Potawat
Page 76 and 77:
Figure 6.2 Conventional development
Page 78 and 79:
Designer/Reviewer Checklist for Clu
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Case Study: Minimizing soil compact
Page 84 and 85:
4. Topsoil stockpiling and storage
Page 86 and 87:
References Hanks, D. and Lewandowsk
Page 88 and 89:
Case Study: Longmeadow Development
Page 90 and 91:
Applications Minimizing the total d
Page 92 and 93:
Criteria to Receive Credits for Min
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Case Study: Marywood Health Center
Page 98 and 99:
Design Considerations 1. Identify n
Page 100 and 101:
References Center for Watershed Pro
Page 102 and 103:
Case Study: Macomb County Public Wo
Page 104 and 105:
Zone 3: Also termed the “outer zo
Page 106 and 107:
• Limit clearing and grading of f
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Case Study: Western Michigan Univer
Page 112 and 113:
Protection of sensitive areas in re
Page 114 and 115:
then weightings of potential develo
Page 116 and 117:
Floodplains • Design the project
Page 118 and 119:
References Arendt, Randall G. Growi
Page 120 and 121:
Case Study: Willard Beach Implement
Page 122 and 123:
Table 6.2 Narrow residential street
Page 124 and 125:
Parking Parking lots often comprise
Page 126 and 127:
Designer/Reviewer Checklist for Red
Page 128 and 129:
Case Study: Saugatuck Center for th
Page 130 and 131:
In addition to directing runoff to
Page 132 and 133:
Designer/Reviewer Checklist for Dis
Page 134 and 135:
Runoff Volume/ Infiltration Runoff
Page 136 and 137:
Figure 7.1 Structural BMP Selection
Page 138 and 139:
In general, the techniques describe
Page 140 and 141:
Table 7.3 Additional BMP considerat
Page 142 and 143:
Maintenance Provides guidance on re
Page 144 and 145:
Case Study: Grayling Stormwater Pro
Page 146 and 147:
Figure 7.5 illustrates a schematic
Page 148 and 149:
Flow inlet: Curbs and curb cuts Cur
Page 150 and 151:
Roads and highways Figure 7.13 show
Page 152 and 153:
Design Considerations Bioretention
Page 154 and 155:
7. Planting periods will vary but,
Page 156 and 157:
Construction Guidelines The followi
Page 158 and 159:
Designer/Reviewer Checklist for Rai
Page 160 and 161:
Case Study: Stormwater Capture with
Page 162 and 163:
Ford Rouge Plant cistern Vertical s
Page 164 and 165:
Design Considerations Design and in
Page 166 and 167:
the tank can accommodate.) (www.sta
Page 168 and 169:
References “Black Vertical Storag
Page 170 and 171:
Case Study: Constructed Linear Sand
Page 172 and 173:
Surface non-vegetated filter A surf
Page 174 and 175:
Large subsurface filter Large Subsu
Page 176 and 177:
would modestly increase constructio
Page 178 and 179:
During inspection the following con
Page 180 and 181:
References Atlanta Regional Commiss
Page 182 and 183:
Site Factors Type Basin Bottom Rela
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Variations For this manual, detenti
Page 188 and 189:
Precast concrete vault Source: Amer
Page 190 and 191:
surface into the pond to a maximum
Page 192 and 193:
sink for pollutants and generally h
Page 194 and 195:
The presettlement and post-developm
Page 196 and 197:
wet pond and constructed wetland op
Page 198 and 199:
ackfilling operation should driven
Page 200 and 201:
Designer/Reviewer Checklist for Dry
Page 202 and 203:
Designer/Reviewer Checklist for Con
Page 204 and 205:
References AMEC Earth and Environme
Page 206 and 207:
Key Design Features • Depth to wa
Page 208 and 209:
Case Study: Saugatuck Center for th
Page 210 and 211:
Infiltration basins, subsurface inf
Page 212 and 213:
Figure 7.24 Cross-section of dry we
Page 214 and 215:
• The soil mantle should be prese
Page 216 and 217:
Additional design considerations fo
Page 218 and 219:
• Though roofs are generally not
Page 220 and 221:
Subsurface infiltration bed Source:
Page 222 and 223:
Stormwater Functions and Calculatio
Page 224 and 225:
• Protect the infiltration area f
Page 226 and 227:
Additional Construction Guidelines
Page 228 and 229:
Designer/Reviewer Checklist for Inf
Page 230 and 231:
References AMEC Earth and Environme
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Case Study: Washtenaw County West S
Page 236 and 237:
Design Considerations Level spreade
Page 238 and 239:
3. Inspect the filter strip and the
Page 240 and 241:
References Hathaway, Jon and Hunt,
Page 242 and 243:
Case Study: Black River Heritage Tr
Page 244 and 245:
Figure 7.31 Native meadow species c
Page 246 and 247:
Applications • Residential - Nati
Page 248 and 249:
5. Amend soil: In those sites where
Page 250 and 251:
Water quality improvement Landscape
Page 252 and 253:
References Arendt, R. Growing Green
Page 254 and 255:
Case Study: Grand Valley State Univ
Page 256 and 257:
Staging, construction practices, an
Page 258 and 259:
Reinforced turf/gravel Reinforced t
Page 260 and 261:
4. Pervious pavement and infiltrati
Page 262 and 263:
12. Proper pervious pavement applic
Page 264 and 265:
Figure 7.40 Open-graded, clean, coa
Page 266 and 267:
Repairs • Surface should never be
Page 268 and 269:
References Adams, Michele. “Porou
Page 270 and 271:
Case Study: Michigan Avenue Streets
Page 272 and 273:
Native vegetation should be used in
Page 274 and 275:
Design Considerations • Suggested
Page 276 and 277:
oxes, etc. should be installed in a
Page 278 and 279:
References Stormwater Management Gu
Page 280 and 281:
Case Study: Nankin Mills Interpreti
Page 282 and 283:
Figure 7.45 Schematic of a three-zo
Page 284 and 285:
3. Analyze site’s vegetative feat
Page 286 and 287:
Black River Heritage Trail and Wate
Page 288 and 289:
Table 7.14 Tree spacing per acre Sp
Page 290 and 291:
4. Stable debris As Zone 1 reaches
Page 292 and 293:
References Alliance for the Chesape
Page 294 and 295:
Case Study: Ann Arbor District Libr
Page 296 and 297:
• Major compaction - Deep compact
Page 298 and 299:
e. Add six inches compost or other
Page 300 and 301:
References “Achieving the Post-Co
Page 302 and 303:
Case Study: Wayne County, MI Ford R
Page 304 and 305:
slope needs to be determined. This
Page 306 and 307:
Figure 7.52 Sandy soils with HSG Gr
Page 308 and 309:
Figure 7.56 Clay Loam, Silty Clay o
Page 310 and 311:
• Guidance information, usually i
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Case Study: City of Battle Creek Ci
Page 316 and 317:
Table 7.16 Vegetated roof types Ext
Page 318 and 319:
Dual media assemblies Dual media (F
Page 320 and 321:
Over a period of time roots can dam
Page 322 and 323:
Technical requirements Root resista
Page 324 and 325:
Stormwater Functions and Calculatio
Page 326 and 327:
Designer/Reviewer Checklist for Veg
Page 328 and 329:
Case Study: Meadowlake Farms Bioswa
Page 330 and 331:
lower flows (two-year storm) to dra
Page 332 and 333:
Stone check dams Source: Road Commi
Page 334 and 335:
Table 7.18 Permanent stabilization
Page 336 and 337:
Peak rate mitigation Vegetated swal
Page 338 and 339:
Designer/Reviewer Checklist for Veg
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Case Study: LaVista Storm Drain Pro
Page 344 and 345:
Basket type inserts Basket type ins
Page 346 and 347:
Maintenance is crucial to the effec
Page 348 and 349:
Roadway design, construction, and m
Page 350 and 351:
• Vegetated systems such as grass
Page 352 and 353:
Of the options explored, the study
Page 354 and 355:
Figure 8.3 Tree planting detail Sou
Page 356 and 357:
Opportunities for MPOs Metropolitan
Page 358 and 359:
Construction on the project began i
Page 360 and 361:
The following are examples of imple
Page 362 and 363:
Horizontal grates can be added to a
Page 364 and 365:
East Hills Center City of Grand Rap
Page 366 and 367:
Implementing LID in High Risk Areas
Page 368 and 369:
References AASHTO Center for Enviro
Page 370 and 371:
LID Design Criteria Defining the hy
Page 372 and 373:
Flood control Flood control is base
Page 374 and 375:
Table 9.1 90 Percent Nonexceedance
Page 376 and 377:
Initial abstraction (I a ) includes
Page 378 and 379:
The Curve Number Method is less acc
Page 380 and 381:
I = the average rainfall intensity
Page 382 and 383:
Table 9.4 Rainfall Events of 24-Hou
Page 384 and 385:
• Proceed to Flow Chart B, Peak R
Page 386 and 387:
FLOW CHART A Stormwater Calculation
Page 388 and 389:
Excessively drained soils may requi
Page 390 and 391:
Worksheet 2. Sensitive Natural Reso
Page 392 and 393:
WORKSHEET 4. Calculations for Volum
Page 394 and 395:
WORKSHEET 6. SMALL SITE / SMALL IMP
Page 396 and 397:
WORKSHEET 8. WATER QUALITY WORKSHEE
Page 398 and 399:
Reese, S. and J. Lee. “Summary of
Page 400 and 401:
ing Department. Most maintenance co
Page 402 and 403:
The Hydrotech Garden Roof Assembly
Page 404 and 405:
Bioswales provide infiltration of s
Page 406 and 407:
The Ingham County Drain Commissione
Page 408 and 409:
Constructed wetland The lowest port
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413: LID Manual for Michigan - Appendix
Page 414 and 415: Check dam Cistern Clustering Combin
Page 416 and 417: H:V Horizontal to vertical ratio. H
Page 418 and 419: Planter box Pervious pavement Phase
Page 420 and 421: Total phosphorous (TP) The total am
Page 422 and 423: Ecoregion recommendations are also
Page 424 and 425: Zone A Planting Zone = two-to-four
Page 426 and 427: Zone C Planting Zone = zero-to-two
Page 428 and 429: Representative Zone C Species Cardi
Page 430 and 431: Botanical Name Common Name Height C
Page 432 and 433: Zone E Planting Zone = four-to-18 i
Page 434 and 435: Representative Zone E Species Tall
Page 436 and 437: Botanical Name Common Name Height C
Page 438 and 439: Zone G Planter Box Plantings Althou
Page 440 and 441: Zone H Vegetated Roof Plantings Res
Page 444 and 445: Pervious Berms (Vegetated Filter St
Page 446 and 447: Vegetated roofs Some key components
Page 450 and 451: Step 1. Background evaluation Prior
Page 452 and 453: Methodology for double-ring infiltr
Page 454 and 455: Step 4. Use design considerations p
Page 458 and 459: Detention BMP Inspection Checklist*
Page 460 and 461: Infiltration BMPs Inspection Checkl
Page 464 and 465: Bioswale, Filter Strip Inspection C
Page 468 and 469: 6. The [Community] or its designee
Page 470 and 471: STATE OF MICHIGAN ) ) ss. COUNTY OF
Page 472 and 473: Exhibit B - Location Map (Sample) S
Page 490 and 491: • Stormwater runoff, soil erosion
Page 492 and 493: Retention. A holding system for sto
Page 494 and 495: ARTICLE IV. STORMWATER PLAN REQUIRE
Page 496 and 497: The particular facilities and measu
Page 498 and 499: 10. Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the
Page 500 and 501: Table H.2 Pre-Treatment Options for
Page 502 and 503: f. Complete development agreements
Page 504 and 505: must be submitted to the Michigan D
Page 506 and 507: C. Construction Plans shall be revi
Page 508 and 509: fine for each day. The rights and r
Page 512:
Southeast Michigan Council of Gover
show all

Low Impact Development Manual for Michigan - OSEH - University ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?