Amadeus IT Holding, S.A. and Subsidiaries - Investor relations at ...
Amadeus IT Holding, S.A. and Subsidiaries - Investor relations at ...
Amadeus IT Holding, S.A. and Subsidiaries - Investor relations at ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
12. Th<strong>at</strong>, with regard to external Board members, the r<strong>at</strong>io of proprietary Board members to<br />
independent Board members should reflect the proportion between the share capital of the<br />
Company represented by proprietary Board members <strong>and</strong> the remaining share capital.<br />
This strict proportional criterion may be reduced in such a way th<strong>at</strong> the number of proprietary<br />
Board members exceeds the number th<strong>at</strong> would apply to the percentage of total share capital<br />
they represent:<br />
1. In companies with high free flo<strong>at</strong> in which interests th<strong>at</strong> are legally considered<br />
significant are minimal or nil, but where there are shareholders whose interest has a high<br />
absolute value.<br />
2. In companies where several shareholders are represented on the Board <strong>and</strong> are not<br />
rel<strong>at</strong>ed to one another.<br />
See sections: B.1.3, A.2 <strong>and</strong> A.3<br />
Explain<br />
Independent Directors represent 36.36% of total external Directors <strong>and</strong> proprietary Directors<br />
represent also 36.36%%, the capital represented by the l<strong>at</strong>ter being 30.33%. Notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
the above, it is important to remark th<strong>at</strong> another three Directors are included under the n<strong>at</strong>ure of<br />
“others” due to they do not qualify either under the c<strong>at</strong>egory of “proprietary” or under the<br />
c<strong>at</strong>egory of “independent” for several reasons.<br />
The Shareholders’ Agreement in force as from April 29, 2010 regul<strong>at</strong>es the principles regul<strong>at</strong>ing<br />
the percentages in the share capital as from which the shareholders sign<strong>at</strong>ory to the Agreement<br />
are entitled to represent<strong>at</strong>ion on the Board.<br />
Hence, more than 25% gives a right to four Board members, less than 25% but more than 10%<br />
gives a right to two Board members, 10% down to 3.5% gives a right to one Board member,<br />
<strong>and</strong> less than 3.5% does not entitle any represent<strong>at</strong>ion, unless two or more of the Shareholders<br />
individually control less than 3.5% of the capital, but together, more than 3.5%, in which case<br />
they may jointly appoint one member to represent them.<br />
Therefore, the shareholder Société Air France is represented by two proprietary Directors, with<br />
15.22% of the share capital of the Company, the shareholder Lufthansa Commercial <strong>Holding</strong><br />
GmbH is represented by one proprietary Director, with 7.61% of the share capital of the<br />
Company <strong>and</strong> the shareholder Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España Sociedad Anónima Operadora,<br />
S.A. is represented by one proprietary Director, with 7.50% of the share capital of the<br />
Company.<br />
13. Th<strong>at</strong> the number of independent Board members should represent <strong>at</strong> least one third of the<br />
total number of Board members.<br />
See section: B.1.3<br />
Complies<br />
14. Th<strong>at</strong> the Board of Directors explain the n<strong>at</strong>ure of each Board member to the shareholders <strong>at</strong><br />
the General Shareholders’ Meeting, so th<strong>at</strong> the shareholders may appoint or r<strong>at</strong>ify the Board<br />
members, <strong>and</strong> th<strong>at</strong> these details be confirmed or, where appropri<strong>at</strong>e, revised each year in the<br />
annual corpor<strong>at</strong>e governance report after verific<strong>at</strong>ion by the Nomin<strong>at</strong>ion Committee. This report<br />
should also explain the reasons for the appointment of proprietary Board members <strong>at</strong> the<br />
proposal of the shareholders whose interest in share capital is less than 5%. It should also<br />
explain, where applicable, why formal requests from shareholders for <strong>at</strong>tendance <strong>at</strong> the Board<br />
meeting were not honored, when their interest is equal to or exceeds th<strong>at</strong> of other shareholders<br />
whose proposal for proprietary Board members was honored.<br />
See sections: B.1.3 <strong>and</strong> B.1.4<br />
55