Benchmarking National - PRO INNO Europe
Benchmarking National - PRO INNO Europe
Benchmarking National - PRO INNO Europe
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
102<br />
BENCHMARKING NATIONAL AND REGIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR SMES IN THE FIELD OF INTELLECTUAL AND INDUSTRIAL <strong>PRO</strong>PERTY<br />
The Japanese TLO system seems to have achieved respectable success since it has<br />
been implemented: Patent applications increased from less than 300 in 1999 to<br />
1054 in 2005; the amount of license revenue created increased almost by a factor<br />
of 20. There seem to be, however, differences in the perception of experts on how<br />
far reaching the success of the TLO actually is. Kneller, for example, maintains that<br />
it has to be kept in mind that the figures still fall short in absolute terms when<br />
compared to the US (Kneller, 2007). The recruitment of able staff is in his view<br />
most likely a challenge in Japan: “…TLO personnel will have to come up the learning<br />
curve in terms of being able to communicate with university researchers and market<br />
inventions.” (Kneller, 2007). By contrast, other experts interviewed in the course<br />
of the underlying benchmarking study see exactly the TLO´s performance in<br />
attracting expert staff as the big success story of the Japanese TLOs.<br />
Literature indicates that in terms of support aimed directly at SMEs, a number of<br />
institutions have been pegged for putting the national IP strategy to practice. Table 8<br />
lists the main actors mentioned and their respective major activity and field of<br />
support. Noteworthy are the existence of a national centre for IP training and the<br />
large portfolio of services of the Japanese Patent Office.<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an experience has shown that webpages, services descriptions or<br />
strategy papers alone offer relatively little insight into the actual performance of the<br />
services, and that hard fact evidence is needed. In this context, opinions about how<br />
well certain services offered in Japan are doing varied considerably.<br />
Table 8 Public institutions in Japan mentioned in literature to provide IPR<br />
support services to SMEs<br />
Institution Abbreviation<br />
Organisation for Small and<br />
Medium Enterprises and<br />
regional Innovation<br />
Japan Institute of Invention<br />
and Innovation<br />
Activity fields for support services<br />
offered for SMEs<br />
SMRJ Advice on strategic IP management<br />
JIII Consultation services on IP issues<br />
Awareness raising seminars/workshops on<br />
IP<br />
Patent information search services<br />
Application advisors (working throughout<br />
the country)<br />
Licensing advisors (working throughout<br />
the country)<br />
<strong>National</strong> Centre for<br />
NCIPI Consultation services on IP issues<br />
Industrial Property<br />
Information and Training<br />
Awareness raising seminars/workshops on<br />
IP<br />
Japanese Patent Office JPO Consultation services on IP issues<br />
Awareness raising seminars/workshops on<br />
IP<br />
Patent information search services<br />
Application advisors (working throughout<br />
the country)<br />
Licensing advisors (working throughout<br />
the country)<br />
Exemptions for SMEs concerning patent<br />
filing costs<br />
Patent Offices of the<br />
Regional Bureaus of<br />
Economy, Trade and<br />
Industry, and SMRJ<br />
Source: Sathirakul, 2006<br />
— Consultation services on IP issues