29.01.2013 Views

Benchmarking National - PRO INNO Europe

Benchmarking National - PRO INNO Europe

Benchmarking National - PRO INNO Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102<br />

BENCHMARKING NATIONAL AND REGIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR SMES IN THE FIELD OF INTELLECTUAL AND INDUSTRIAL <strong>PRO</strong>PERTY<br />

The Japanese TLO system seems to have achieved respectable success since it has<br />

been implemented: Patent applications increased from less than 300 in 1999 to<br />

1054 in 2005; the amount of license revenue created increased almost by a factor<br />

of 20. There seem to be, however, differences in the perception of experts on how<br />

far reaching the success of the TLO actually is. Kneller, for example, maintains that<br />

it has to be kept in mind that the figures still fall short in absolute terms when<br />

compared to the US (Kneller, 2007). The recruitment of able staff is in his view<br />

most likely a challenge in Japan: “…TLO personnel will have to come up the learning<br />

curve in terms of being able to communicate with university researchers and market<br />

inventions.” (Kneller, 2007). By contrast, other experts interviewed in the course<br />

of the underlying benchmarking study see exactly the TLO´s performance in<br />

attracting expert staff as the big success story of the Japanese TLOs.<br />

Literature indicates that in terms of support aimed directly at SMEs, a number of<br />

institutions have been pegged for putting the national IP strategy to practice. Table 8<br />

lists the main actors mentioned and their respective major activity and field of<br />

support. Noteworthy are the existence of a national centre for IP training and the<br />

large portfolio of services of the Japanese Patent Office.<br />

The <strong>Europe</strong>an experience has shown that webpages, services descriptions or<br />

strategy papers alone offer relatively little insight into the actual performance of the<br />

services, and that hard fact evidence is needed. In this context, opinions about how<br />

well certain services offered in Japan are doing varied considerably.<br />

Table 8 Public institutions in Japan mentioned in literature to provide IPR<br />

support services to SMEs<br />

Institution Abbreviation<br />

Organisation for Small and<br />

Medium Enterprises and<br />

regional Innovation<br />

Japan Institute of Invention<br />

and Innovation<br />

Activity fields for support services<br />

offered for SMEs<br />

SMRJ Advice on strategic IP management<br />

JIII Consultation services on IP issues<br />

Awareness raising seminars/workshops on<br />

IP<br />

Patent information search services<br />

Application advisors (working throughout<br />

the country)<br />

Licensing advisors (working throughout<br />

the country)<br />

<strong>National</strong> Centre for<br />

NCIPI Consultation services on IP issues<br />

Industrial Property<br />

Information and Training<br />

Awareness raising seminars/workshops on<br />

IP<br />

Japanese Patent Office JPO Consultation services on IP issues<br />

Awareness raising seminars/workshops on<br />

IP<br />

Patent information search services<br />

Application advisors (working throughout<br />

the country)<br />

Licensing advisors (working throughout<br />

the country)<br />

Exemptions for SMEs concerning patent<br />

filing costs<br />

Patent Offices of the<br />

Regional Bureaus of<br />

Economy, Trade and<br />

Industry, and SMRJ<br />

Source: Sathirakul, 2006<br />

— Consultation services on IP issues

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!