29.01.2013 Views

Benchmarking National - PRO INNO Europe

Benchmarking National - PRO INNO Europe

Benchmarking National - PRO INNO Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In contrast to arrangements for patents, a community wide registered design (the<br />

registered community design, abbreviated CD) was implemented. Since January<br />

2003, firms are able to register the design at O.H.I.M. (Office for Harmonization in<br />

the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)) in Alicante, Spain. A design<br />

registered at this office is automatically valid in all member states of the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />

Union – no further validation or translation is needed. OHIM also administers the<br />

Community Trade mark, which implements structures similar to the CD for trade<br />

marks.<br />

Copyrights comprise the fourth large pillar of the IPR system. Work protected by<br />

a copyright may not be legally reproduced, distributed and communicated to the<br />

public without the consent of the owner. Furthermore, the owner has to give<br />

permission to publicly lend, rent or perform the work under his/hers copyright. The<br />

copyright is an example of an IPR instrument of lesser legal formality, because it<br />

does not need to be registered. It arises automatically, once it is “fixed” in some<br />

way (e.g., on paper, on film, on recordings, by using files on servers in the internet,<br />

etc.).<br />

The copyright covers the way ideas are expressed, but not the ideas themselves.<br />

For example, Dan Brown’s book “The Da Vinci Code” was cleared of charges that<br />

it would infringe the copyright of an earlier book which already contained many of<br />

the theories written in “The Da Vinci Code”. Using ideas from copyrighted work for<br />

one’s own work is thus not considered to be a copyright infringement. Exceptions<br />

to this rule have been, however, put in place for two cases: (1) if transaction costs<br />

for clearing rights are too high (e.g., for book reviews or for copying for noncommercial<br />

private research under library privilege); and (2) in order to account for<br />

equity issues (e.g., translation of texts into Braille or copying for preservation).<br />

Besides the four main IPR instruments above, there are also other IPR instruments<br />

which have been developed to cope with specific types of inventions. Examples<br />

include plant varieties, semi-conductor topographies, geographic indications or IPR<br />

titles for databases. These types of IPR are summarised as “sui generis rights” (as<br />

opposed to primary IP rights).<br />

A last noteworthy type of IPR is the utility model. The utility model was<br />

introduced as a cheaper but simpler alternative to patents, especially with the<br />

needs of SMEs in mind. It is available only in a limited number of countries – in<br />

particular, in some <strong>Europe</strong>an countries (Austria, Germany, France, Finland, Italy,<br />

Spain, Portugal, Poland) and, for example, in Japan, Taiwan and China. The utility<br />

model can be best described as a “patent light”: It has less stringent patentability<br />

requirements, a shorter maximum life time and it is not substantially examined<br />

upon registration (in terms of prior art search), but it enjoys also a smaller degree<br />

of legal protection. Legislation varies from country to country, but the basic<br />

concept is the same.<br />

3.2.2 Informal IP protection mechanisms<br />

The formal IPR system provides a framework for protecting the intellectual property<br />

of a firm. As stated in section 3.1, the system can be considered to facilitate specific<br />

deals between society and inventors: The inventor receives some form of defensible<br />

exclusivity in exchange for making otherwise secret information available to the<br />

public. The aim of the system is to maximise welfare and innovation output, taking<br />

into account both the interests of the original innovator and that of follow-on<br />

innovators.<br />

For the profit-maximising firm, it is, however, important to know that it can also<br />

use mechanisms and/or engage in behaviours outside the IPR system in order to<br />

protect its intellectual property. Such informal IP protection practices are extremely<br />

varied (Kuusisto, 2007; Kitching & Blackburn, 2003: 21). Examples include building<br />

specialist know-how into products to restrict the possibility of re-engineering,<br />

regulating access to information or, as an alternative, disseminating knowledge<br />

29<br />

SMEs IN THE IPR WORLD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!