30.01.2013 Views

Aging and Disability Services Council Sharon Swift Butterworth ...

Aging and Disability Services Council Sharon Swift Butterworth ...

Aging and Disability Services Council Sharon Swift Butterworth ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TITLE 40 SOCIAL SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE<br />

PART 1 DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND DISABILITY SERVICES<br />

CHAPTER 99 CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS BARRING FACILITY LICENSURE<br />

The Health <strong>and</strong> Human <strong>Services</strong> Commission (HHSC) proposes, on behalf of the Department of<br />

<strong>Aging</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Disability</strong> <strong>Services</strong> (DADS), an amendment to §99.3, concerning convictions barring<br />

licensure, in Chapter 99, Criminal Convictions Barring Facility Licensure.<br />

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE<br />

The purpose of the amendment is to implement Senate Bill 78, 82nd Legislature, Regular<br />

Session, 2011, authorizing DADS to deny or refuse to renew a license if an applicant or certain<br />

persons associated with an applicant are listed in a health <strong>and</strong> human service agency's record of<br />

adverse licensing action maintained in accordance with Texas Government Code §531.952. In<br />

addition, the title of Chapter 99 is changed to Denial or Refusal of License.<br />

SECTION-BY-SECTION SUMMARY<br />

The proposed new §99.3, Adverse Licensing Record, adds that DADS may deny a license<br />

application or refuse to renew a license if an applicant or certain associated persons are listed in<br />

the record maintained in accordance with Texas Government Code §531.952.<br />

FISCAL NOTE<br />

Gordon Taylor, DADS Chief Financial Officer, has determined that, for the first five years the<br />

proposed amendment is in effect, enforcing or administering the amendment does not have<br />

foreseeable implications relating to costs or revenues of state or local governments.<br />

SMALL BUSINESS AND MICRO-BUSINESS IMPACT ANALYSIS<br />

DADS has determined that the proposed amendment will not have an adverse economic effect on<br />

small businesses or micro-businesses, because there is no economic cost to persons required to<br />

comply with the amendment..<br />

PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COSTS<br />

Veronda Durden, DADS Assistant Commissioner for Regulatory <strong>Services</strong>, has determined that,<br />

for each year of the first five years the amendment is in effect, the public benefit expected as a<br />

result of enforcing the amendment is additional protection of the health <strong>and</strong> safety of the<br />

individuals receiving services from entities regulated by DADS.<br />

Ms. Durden anticipates that there will not be an economic cost to persons who are required to<br />

comply with the amendment. The amendment will not affect a local economy.<br />

- 21 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!