Miljøeffektiv teknologi eller miljøteknologi i de ... - Ecoinnovation

tional angle, but also hopefully a slightly more honest approach than is
generally seen in publications promoting a country.
These recommendations, as described below may be discussed at a
joint seminar.
Denmark
It is proposed that Denmark, when the new climate/energy compromise
is in place, could prepare a publication on what has been done and how
to approach the phase-out of greenhouse gases. Denmark could also
draft a publication about eco-efficient technology in the agricultural
sector, since Denmark clearly has done quite a lot in this area, but still
has tasks to do.
Finland
Finland has done a lot on demand and regulation and may, by translation
of the material for example into English, start a good discussion.
Finland can also be the leader for user-driven innovation that is well
developed in Finland.
Iceland
Iceland should tell about its road to a green economy. And Iceland can as
well tell about the great opportunity in the use of geothermal energy and
the future prospects for this.
Norway
Norway has unique experience in CCS, carbon capture and storage at sea
and should tell about the experiences in using this technology. Norway has
also a high efficiency in reducing the use of energy in the field of industry
compared to other Nordic countries and this could be described.
Sweden
Sweden is ahead in several areas. One should make a detailed publication
about sustainable cities, showing how far you can reach in a single
country. Sweden could also promote the country by telling about what
has been done for green public procurement, as it seems clear that Sweden
is a leader among the Nordic countries in that area.
226 Miljøeffektiv teknologi eller miljøteknologi i de nordiske lande