20.02.2013 Views

Full page photo print - Harvard Law School Project on Disability

Full page photo print - Harvard Law School Project on Disability

Full page photo print - Harvard Law School Project on Disability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

examples of barriers to Participati<strong>on</strong> in decisi<strong>on</strong>-making<br />

• Attitudes about the value of inclusi<strong>on</strong> of people with disabilities in decisi<strong>on</strong>-making<br />

processes<br />

• Lack of accessible informati<strong>on</strong> about public meetings and c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong>s, political<br />

parties, voting, and registrati<strong>on</strong><br />

• Lack of transportati<strong>on</strong> to public meetings, registrati<strong>on</strong>, and polling stati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

• Physical barriers to public buildings, including courts, voting registrati<strong>on</strong> centers,<br />

and polling stati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

• Polling stati<strong>on</strong>s in rooms too small to accommodate people using wheelchairs and<br />

voting boxes placed <strong>on</strong> high tables<br />

• Lack of accessible informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> voting procedures for voters with sensory<br />

disabilities<br />

• Poorly trained electi<strong>on</strong> workers<br />

• Hostility and/or exclusi<strong>on</strong> of people with psycho-social disability and intellectual<br />

disabilities in decisi<strong>on</strong>-making processes<br />

• Lack of alternative voting devices or accessible voting methods for people with<br />

sensory disabilities<br />

• Lack of mobile voting mechanisms for people who cannot leave their homes or who<br />

are currently residing in hospitals/instituti<strong>on</strong>s .<br />

eXeRcise 3.1: what Rights to Participati<strong>on</strong> in decisi<strong>on</strong>-making<br />

Does the CRPD Affirm?<br />

objective: To review and understand the rights to participati<strong>on</strong> and public life affirmed by the<br />

CRPD<br />

Time: 30 minutes<br />

materials: Chart paper and markers or blackboard and chalk<br />

1. Review:<br />

Divide participants into small groups and assign each group different parts of Article 29, such as<br />

Articles 29(a)(i) and 29(b) . Ask each group to work together to:<br />

• paraphrase their assigned secti<strong>on</strong> in comm<strong>on</strong>, clearly understandable language, and<br />

• give some examples of how that right could be enjoyed and make a difference for people<br />

with disabilities .<br />

2. Paraphrase/give examples:<br />

Read each secti<strong>on</strong> of Article 29 aloud and ask the assigned group to give their paraphrase .<br />

Discuss the meaning of the secti<strong>on</strong> until every<strong>on</strong>e can agree <strong>on</strong> a paraphrase. Write the final<br />

paraphrase of each secti<strong>on</strong> Article 29 <strong>on</strong> chart paper .<br />

After each secti<strong>on</strong> ask for examples of how that right could be implemented and make a<br />

difference for people with disabilities .<br />

PART 2: The c<strong>on</strong>venTi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> The RighTs of PeRs<strong>on</strong>s wiTh disAbiliTies<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!