20.02.2013 Views

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Female shortnose sturgeon spawn every three to five years. Males spawn every other year,<br />

although some may spawn in consecutive years (Dovel et al. 1992, Collins <strong>and</strong> Smith 1993,<br />

Kieffer <strong>and</strong> Kynard 1993, NMFS 1998a). Spawning typically occurs during the spring, between<br />

mid-March <strong>and</strong> late May. Spawning areas are often located just below the fall line at the farthest<br />

accessible upstream reach of the river (NMFS 1998a).<br />

Male shortnose sturgeon in southern rivers will first spawn between ages 2 <strong>and</strong> 5, while fish as<br />

far north as the St. John River, Canada first spawn at about 10 to 11 years of age (Dadswell et al.<br />

1984a, NMFS 1998a). Age at first spawning for female shortnose sturgeon varies from about<br />

age 6 to 18 years, like males, varying on a latitudinal cline (Dadswell et al. 1984a, NMFS<br />

1998a). In general, fish in the northern portion of the species’ range live longer than individuals<br />

in the southern portion of the species’ range (Gilbert 1989). The maximum age reported for a<br />

shortnose sturgeon in the St. John River in New Brunswick is 67 years (for a female), 40 years<br />

for the Kennebec River, 37 years for the Hudson River, 34 years in the Connecticut River, 20<br />

years in the Pee Dee River <strong>and</strong> 10 years in the Altamaha River (Gilbert 1989). Male shortnose<br />

sturgeon appear to have shorter life spans than females (Gilbert 1989).<br />

Like all sturgeon, shortnose have ventrally located, sucker-like mouths, structured for feeding on<br />

benthos. Foraging generally occurs in areas with abundant macrophytes, where juvenile <strong>and</strong><br />

adult shortnose sturgeon feed on amphipods, polychaetes <strong>and</strong> gasteropods (Dadswell et al.<br />

1984b, Moser <strong>and</strong> Ross 1995, NMFS 1998a). Sturgeon use electroreception to identify prey.<br />

Olfaction <strong>and</strong> taste are also likely important to foraging, while vision is thought to play a minor<br />

role (Miller 2004). As adults, a significant portion of a shortnose sturgeon’s diet may consist of<br />

freshwater mollusks (Dadswell et al. 1984b). Based on observations by Kynard et al., (2000),<br />

shortnose sturgeon will consume the entire mollusk, excreting the shell after ingestion.<br />

Status <strong>and</strong> Trends<br />

Shortnose sturgeon were listed as endangered on March 11, 1967, under the Endangered Species<br />

Preservation Act (32 FR 4001) <strong>and</strong> remained on the endangered species list with enactment of<br />

the ESA of 1973, as amended. Pollution <strong>and</strong> overfishing, including bycatch in the shad fishery,<br />

were listed as principal reasons for the species' decline. Shortnose sturgeon are listed as an<br />

endangered species throughout all of its range<br />

Northern shortnose sturgeon population abundances are generally larger than southern<br />

populations (Kynard 1997). Updated population estimates also suggest that three of the largest<br />

populations (Kennebec, Hudson <strong>and</strong> Delaware River) may be increasing or stable, although data<br />

is limited. The New York (Hudson River) shortnose sturgeon population is the largest extant<br />

population of this species <strong>and</strong>, based on available data, appears to have increased (Bain et al.<br />

2000). The most recent population estimate indicates this population consists of about 61,000shortnose<br />

sturgeon (95% confidence interval [CI] was between 52,898 <strong>and</strong> 72,191 fish (Bain et<br />

al. 2000). A comparison of the Bain estimate to the 1979/1980 population estimate of spawning<br />

adults by Dovel et al., (1992); about 13,000 fish) led Bain et al., (2000) to conclude that the<br />

population had made a dramatic increase (about 400% increase) between 1979 <strong>and</strong> 1997. While<br />

still evidence of an increasing population, a comparison of total population estimates<br />

(30,000:60,000) would suggest the population has only doubled in size during the study years.<br />

Similarly, the Kennebec River population appears to be increasing. The most recent estimate for<br />

140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!