20.02.2013 Views

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

established coral assemblages, <strong>and</strong> chemical cues (Lewis 1974, Birkel<strong>and</strong> 1977, Goreau et al.<br />

1981, Rogers et al. 1984, Baggett <strong>and</strong> Bright 1985, Harriott 1985, Hughes <strong>and</strong> Jackson 1985,<br />

Sammarco 1985, Morse et al. 1988, Fisk <strong>and</strong> Harriott 1990, Richmond <strong>and</strong> Hunter 1990).<br />

Growth rates are relatively rapid, expressed as the linear extension of branches, ranging from<br />

1.57 to 4.33 inches annually, <strong>and</strong> have enabled elkhorn coral to construct significant reefs in<br />

several locations throughout the Caribbean (Vaughan 1915, Jaap 1974, Adey 1978). Branching<br />

species, such as acroporid corals, grow differentially in response to light such that coral polyp<br />

growth maximizes exposure to available light (Kaniewska et al. 2009). Growth can also occur<br />

from fragmentation <strong>and</strong> dispersal (Tunnicliffe 1981, Bak <strong>and</strong> Criens 1982). A broken branch<br />

may be carried by waves <strong>and</strong> currents to another location <strong>and</strong>, if favorable, branches grow into a<br />

new colony. Rapid growth <strong>and</strong> fragment dispersal facilitate a competitive advantage for elkhorn<br />

coral relative to other coral <strong>and</strong> benthic species (Shinn 1976, Neigel <strong>and</strong> Avise 1983, Jaap et al.<br />

1989).<br />

Elkhorn coral require relatively clear water <strong>and</strong> depend almost entirely upon symbiotic<br />

photosynthesizers (zoozanthelle) for nourishment (Porter 1976, Lewis 1977, Jaap et al. 1989,<br />

Mieog et al. 2009) <strong>and</strong> is much more susceptible to increases in water turbidity than are some<br />

other corals. Different strains of symbiotic zoozanthelle (Symbiodinium spp.) can confer<br />

different thermal <strong>and</strong> light tolerances to acroporiids (Abrego et al. 2009, Ainsworth <strong>and</strong> Hoegh-<br />

Guldberg 2009, Abrego et al. 2010). The type of Symbiodinium spp. may change during<br />

ontogeny or remain the same, depending upon acroporiid species, <strong>and</strong> may be the same as parent<br />

colonies or not (Baird et al. 2007, Gómez-Cabrera et al. 2008, Abrego et al. 2009).<br />

Habitat<br />

Colonies of elkhorn coral often grow in dense st<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> form interlocking framework known as<br />

thickets in fringing <strong>and</strong> barrier reefs, ranging in depth from 3.3 to 49 feet (Jaap 1984, Dustan<br />

1985, Dustan <strong>and</strong> Halas 1987, Tomascik <strong>and</strong> S<strong>and</strong>er 1987, Wheaton <strong>and</strong> Jaap 1988). However,<br />

optimal depth range is considered to be 3.3 to 16.4 feet in depth, with possible exposure at low<br />

tide (Goreau <strong>and</strong> Wells 1967). Colonies generally do not form thickets below 16.4 feet, with<br />

maximum water depths of framework construction ranging from 10 to 39.4 feet (Lighty et al.<br />

1982). Elkhorn coral thrive in shallow reef zones where wave energy is a significant factor. In<br />

areas with strong wave energy conditions only isolated colonies occur, while denser thickets may<br />

develop in intermediate wave energy conditions (Geister 1977). The preferred habitat of elkhorn<br />

coral is the seaward face of a reef (Shinn 1963, Cairns 1982, Rogers et al. 1982).<br />

Status <strong>and</strong> trends<br />

Elkhorn coral was listed as threatened under the ESA on May 9, 2006 (71 FR 26852). Elkhorn<br />

coral underwent precipitous declines in the early 1980s throughout its range <strong>and</strong> this decline has<br />

continued. Although quantitative data on historical distribution <strong>and</strong> abundance are scarce, best<br />

available data indicate declines in abundance (coverage <strong>and</strong> colony numbers) by greater than<br />

97%. Recovery from a bleaching event in 2005 is expected to take 10-12 years; this is after a<br />

previous event in 1997. In all, roughly one-third of the Acropora palamata genotypes have been<br />

lost as a result of these events (Miller <strong>and</strong> Williamson 2010).<br />

187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!