20.02.2013 Views

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Integration <strong>and</strong> Synthesis<br />

The EPA proposes to issue <strong>and</strong> implement the <strong>Vessel</strong> <strong>General</strong> <strong>Permit</strong> (VGP) <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Small</strong><br />

<strong>Vessel</strong> <strong>General</strong> <strong>Permit</strong> (sVGP), which authorize discharges incidental to the normal operation of<br />

non-recreational <strong>and</strong> non-military vessels into waters of the U.S. The statutory authority for the<br />

proposed action is the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) of the Clean<br />

Water Act (33 USC 1342 et seq.; CWA). The VGP was first issued by EPA in 2008; the<br />

proposed permit, if issued, will become active in December 2013 <strong>and</strong> expire in December 2018.<br />

The sVGP is a new permit; if issued, it will become active in December 2013 <strong>and</strong> expire in<br />

December 2018.<br />

The EPA expects that vessels greater than 79 feet in length or with 8 cubic meters or more of<br />

ballast water capacity will seek coverage under the VGP. <strong>Vessel</strong>s less than 79 feet <strong>and</strong> with less<br />

than 8 cubic meters of ballast water capacity may be eligible for coverage under the sVGP,<br />

which has less stringent restrictions <strong>and</strong> fewer reporting requirements. The EPA estimates that<br />

approximately 72,000 vessels may be eligible for coverage under the VGP <strong>and</strong> approximately<br />

138,000 vessels may be eligible for coverage under the sVGP.<br />

The action will occur throughout the waters of the U.S., i.e., the action area. The proposed<br />

action is likely to adversely affect the following ESA-listed species: Cook Inlet beluga whale,<br />

southern resident killer whale, North Atlantic right whale, humpback whale, green sea turtle (all<br />

populations), hawksbill sea turtle, Kemp’s ridley sea turtle, leatherback sea turtle, loggerhead sea<br />

turtle, olive ridley sea turtle, Gulf of Maine Atlantic salmon, bocaccio, canary rockfish, Pacific<br />

eulachon, yelloweye rockfish, Chinook salmon (all DPS), chum salmon (all DPS), coho salmon<br />

(all DPS), sockeye salmon (all DPS), steelhead (all DPS), Atlantic sturgeon (all DPS), green<br />

sturgeon, gulf sturgeon, shortnose sturgeon, smalltooth sawfish, black abalone, white abalone,<br />

elkhorn coral, staghorn coral, <strong>and</strong> Johnson’s seagrass.<br />

The proposed action is likely to adversely affect the following designated critical habitat: Cook<br />

Inlet beluga whale, southern resident killer whale, North Atlantic right whale, Gulf of Maine<br />

Atlantic salmon, Chinook salmon (all DPS), chum salmon (all DPS), coho salmon (all DPS),<br />

sockeye salmon (all DPS), steelhead (all DPS), southern green sturgeon, gulf sturgeon,<br />

smalltooth sawfish, black abalone, elkhorn coral, staghorn coral, <strong>and</strong> Johnson’s seagrass.<br />

In the Opinion, we described the status of each species <strong>and</strong> the environmental baseline. We also<br />

discussed the effects of the action, i.e., exposure, stressors, response, <strong>and</strong> risks. Here, we<br />

integrate this information to describe stressors of the greatest concern (i.e., ANS, copper, <strong>and</strong><br />

selenium) <strong>and</strong> the likely consequences of exposing listed resources to these stressors.<br />

Aquatic nuisance species (carried in ballast water, on hulls, <strong>and</strong> in chain lockers, seachests, <strong>and</strong><br />

fish holds of vessels) may be discharged into waters of the U.S. While ANS are themselves<br />

stressors, the mechanisms by which they adversely affect listed resources include: predation,<br />

competition, trophic alteration, ecosystem alteration, disease transmission, <strong>and</strong> genetic<br />

introgression. Because of the magnitude of these mechanisms, ANS are likely to reduce the<br />

fitness (i.e., survival <strong>and</strong>/or reproduction) of exposed individuals.<br />

324

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!