20.02.2013 Views

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Estimates of Exposure Resulting from Discharges Authorized by the VGP <strong>and</strong><br />

sVGP<br />

This section summarizes the modeling approach EPA used to estimate exposure of threatened<br />

<strong>and</strong> endangered species <strong>and</strong> their critical habitat to VGP-authorized discharges. Greater detail is<br />

provided in section 5 of EPA’s BE. Representative Action Areas (RAAs) were selected by EPA<br />

after consultation with the Services to be used to evaluate the potential exposure <strong>and</strong> effects of<br />

permitted discharges on listed aquatic <strong>and</strong> aquatic-dependent species, as well as their designated<br />

critical habitats. The following selection criteria were used to identify the RAAs evaluated in the<br />

BE:<br />

� High density of vessels covered under the VGP <strong>and</strong> sVGP to capture a reasonable “worst<br />

case” scenario;<br />

� Varying percentages of vessel types present to capture the variability in pollutant loading<br />

rates;<br />

� Selection of RAAs that provide broad coverage of diverse ecosystem types <strong>and</strong> broad<br />

geographical representation;<br />

� Selection of “special interest” locations with known or expected sensitivities for specific<br />

taxa <strong>and</strong> their critical habitats (i.e., Pacific coast salmonid populations, sea turtles in Gulf<br />

of Mexico, etc.) <strong>and</strong>/or specific vulnerabilities (e.g., historic introduction <strong>and</strong> spread of<br />

ANS in the Great Lakes).<br />

EPA’s NOI Summary Report <strong>and</strong> EPA’s Report to Congress on <strong>Vessel</strong> Discharges were used to<br />

identify the top Home/Hailing Ports for each vessel type. For vessels expected to be covered<br />

under the sVGPs (large <strong>and</strong> small), New York, NY; Houston, TX, <strong>and</strong> Seattle, WA were<br />

consistently among the top 10 port cities, as well as other ports such New Orleans, LA; Miami,<br />

FL; Los Angeles, CA; Norfolk, VA; Pittsburgh, PA; <strong>and</strong> St. Louis, MO (to name a few). Among<br />

these port cities, nearly all are representative of estuarine/marine ecosystems, except for inl<strong>and</strong><br />

port cities such as Jeffersonville (Indiana), Pittsburgh, St. Louis <strong>and</strong> Cincinnati (top port cities<br />

for barges on large inl<strong>and</strong> rivers). Port cities on a large freshwater lake (Great Lakes) system do<br />

not appear to be among the most heavily trafficked. From this initial list of port cities, EPA<br />

selected seven RAAs for detailed evaluation in the BE that were both ecologically <strong>and</strong><br />

geographically diverse <strong>and</strong> captured several special interest locations identified during<br />

preliminary informal consultation meetings with the Services (Table 24).<br />

264

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!