20.02.2013 Views

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

even slightly more acidic sea water (thereby eroding the shells which form coral hard<br />

parts)(Anthony et al. 2008, De’ath et al. 2009, Wei et al. 2009, Crawley et al. 2010).<br />

Acidification also reduces the thermal tolerance of corals, meaning that bleaching can occur at<br />

lower temperatures (Anthony et al. 2008). Hurricanes can cause wide-scale inhibition of<br />

recruitment in years following storm passage as well as physical damage to coral colonies<br />

themselves (Mallela <strong>and</strong> Crabbe 2009).<br />

White b<strong>and</strong> disease is thought to be the major factor responsible for the rapid loss of Atlantic<br />

Acropora due to mass mortalities. White b<strong>and</strong> disease is the only coral disease to date that has<br />

been documented to cause major changes in the composition <strong>and</strong> structure of reefs (Humann <strong>and</strong><br />

Deloach 2003). In 2011, Sutherl<strong>and</strong> et al. (2011) were able to definitively identify human waste<br />

as a cause for white pox disease in elkhorn corals.<br />

Reductions in long-term water clarity can also reduce the coral photosynthesis to respiration ratio<br />

(P/R ratio). Telescnicki <strong>and</strong> Goldberg (1995) <strong>and</strong> Yentsch et al. (2002) found that elevated turbidity<br />

levels did not affect gross photosynthetic oxygen production, but did lead to increased respiration<br />

that consumed the products of photosynthesis with little remaining for coral growth.<br />

Unfortunately, since staghorn corals are broadcast spawners once colonies become rare, the<br />

distance between colonies may limit fertilization success <strong>and</strong> there is substantial evidence to<br />

suggest that sexual recruitment of staghorn corals is currently compromised. Reduced colony<br />

density in some areas is compounded by low genotypic diversity, indicating that fertilization<br />

success <strong>and</strong> consequently, larval availability, is likely reduced. This can have long-term<br />

implications for genetic variability of remaining colonies due to the reduced potential for<br />

exchange of genetic material between populations that are spatially further apart (Bruckner<br />

2002).<br />

Data on levels of genetic diversity <strong>and</strong> population structure suggest that there is a population<br />

structure among isl<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> even over spatial scales of no more than 20 km, as well as varying<br />

degrees of genetic diversity within local populations (Lirman 2002, Vollmer 2002). For<br />

instance, one clone of staghorn coral may dominate areas up to 10 m 2 in size <strong>and</strong> the clones are<br />

generally spatially discrete with larval exchange between staghorn populations as close as 2 to 15<br />

km being extremely limited, suggesting that larval sources need to be conserved on a very small<br />

spatial scale (Baums et al. 2005, Vollmer <strong>and</strong> Palumbi 2007).<br />

Anthropogenic threats<br />

Threats to staghorn coral are exacerbated further by eutrophication, sedimentation, <strong>and</strong><br />

anchoring, which degrade coral condition <strong>and</strong> increase synergistic stress effects (e.g. bleaching).<br />

Excessive sedimentation can smother corals <strong>and</strong> increased nutrient availability promotes algal<br />

growth on corals, leading to light blockage to zoozanthelle <strong>and</strong> death of corals (Acropora<br />

Biological Review Team 2005). Although reefs in the Florida Keys currently experience about<br />

10% macroalgal cover or less, much of the wider Caribbean Sea may exceed 20% cover (Bruno<br />

2008), inhibiting <strong>and</strong> reducing coral survival. Global warming is also projected to have negative<br />

impacts on coral survival through coral bleaching, increased storm intensity, <strong>and</strong> reduced<br />

calcification (Acropora Biological Review Team 2005).<br />

193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!