20.02.2013 Views

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Declines have been noted in both numbers as well as frequencies. This likely due to the targeted<br />

removal of larger, older, <strong>and</strong> more fecund individuals by commercial fisheries, reducing the<br />

ability of canary rockfish to rebound from excessive mortality (NMFS 2008e). For example,<br />

recreational fishing data have not reported any individuals caught greater than 55 cm since 2000,<br />

whereas a variety of large size classes had formerly been caught. There are concerns that even<br />

now some populations have been lost entirely, primarily due to over harvesting, but also due to<br />

low dissolved oxygen levels in some areas of Puget Sound (NMFS 2008e).<br />

Natural threats<br />

Interspecies competition, predators, <strong>and</strong> climactic regimes are the primary natural factors that<br />

depress canary rockfish numbers. Copper <strong>and</strong> quillback rockfish may compete with canary<br />

rockfish in Puget Sound for available resources (NMFS 2008e). Predators of canary rockfish<br />

include other rockfishes, lingcod (for which rockfish is a particularly important dietary<br />

component), cabezon, seabirds, salmon, sharks, dolphins, seals, Steller sea lions, <strong>and</strong> perhaps<br />

river otters (Merkel 1957, Miller <strong>and</strong> Geibel 1973, Morejohn et al. 1978, Roberts 1979,<br />

Antonelis Jr. <strong>and</strong> Fiscus 1980, Ainley et al. 1981, Rosenthal et al. 1982, Stevens <strong>and</strong> Miller<br />

1983, Love et al. 1991, Beaudreau <strong>and</strong> Essington 2007, Lance <strong>and</strong> Jeffries 2007). Canary <strong>and</strong><br />

other rockfishes appear to be negatively influenced by El Niño conditions, possibly reducing<br />

available prey supply (Moser et al. 2000a, Harvey 2005).<br />

Anthropogenic threats<br />

Overharvesting the primary cause of canary rockfish declines, but habitat loss is also important.<br />

Canary rockfish are considered overfished by the Pacific Fisheries Management Council <strong>and</strong> are<br />

not presently harvested intentionally. However, bycatch is still considered to be a high impact<br />

stressor to rockfish populations of Washington State waters (Palsson et al. 2008). Habitat loss is<br />

also a factor in canary rockfish decline, with rocky habitats (reportedly, there are only 217 km 2 in<br />

Puget Sound) being threatened by construction of bridges, sewer lines, cable <strong>and</strong> pipeline<br />

deployment, <strong>and</strong> dredge spoil (Palsson et al. 2008). Low oxygen levels as well as pollutant,<br />

chemical, <strong>and</strong> nutrient loading are also considered significant threats to canary rockfish recovery<br />

(NMFS 2008e).<br />

Critical habitat<br />

Critical habitat has not been designated or proposed for canary rockfish.<br />

<strong>Small</strong>tooth Sawfish<br />

Description of the species<br />

The smalltooth sawfish is a tropical marine <strong>and</strong> estuarine elasmobranch fish (sharks <strong>and</strong> rays)<br />

that has been reported to have a circumtropical distribution. Although they are rays, sawfish<br />

physically more resemble sharks, with only the trunk <strong>and</strong> especially the head ventrally flattened.<br />

<strong>Small</strong>tooth sawfish are characterized by their “saw,” a long, narrow, flattened rostral blade with<br />

a series of transverse teeth along either edge.<br />

Distribution<br />

In the western Atlantic, the smalltooth sawfish has been reported from Brazil through the<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!