20.02.2013 Views

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

other specified estuarine waters. These areas are important for the species’ overall conservation<br />

by protecting quality growth, reproduction, <strong>and</strong> feeding. Factors contributing to the downward<br />

trends in this ESU include reduced access to spawning/rearing habitat, possible loss of genetic<br />

integrity through population bottlenecks, inadequately screened diversions, predation at artificial<br />

structures <strong>and</strong> by nonnative species, pollution from Iron Mountain Mine <strong>and</strong> other sources,<br />

adverse flow conditions, high summer water temperatures, unsustainable harvest rates, passage<br />

problems at various structures, <strong>and</strong> vulnerability to drought (Good et al. 2005).<br />

Final Protective Regulations<br />

On June 28, 2005, as part of the final listing determinations for 16 ESUs of West Coast salmon,<br />

NMFS amended <strong>and</strong> streamlined the 4(d) protective regulations for threatened salmon <strong>and</strong><br />

steelhead (70 FR 37160) as described in the Protective Regulations for Threatened Salmonid<br />

Species section of this document. Under this change, the section 4(d) protections apply to<br />

natural <strong>and</strong> hatchery fish with an intact adipose fin, but not to listed hatchery fish that have had<br />

their adipose fin removed prior to release into the wild. The amended June 2005 4(d) rule<br />

applies to the Snake River fall-run Chinook salmon ESU.<br />

Snake River Fall-Run Chinook Salmon<br />

Distribution <strong>and</strong> Description of the Listed Species<br />

The Snake River fall-run Chinook salmon ESU includes all naturally spawned populations of<br />

fall-run Chinook salmon in the mainstem Snake River below Hells Canyon Dam, <strong>and</strong> in the<br />

Tucannon River, Gr<strong>and</strong>e Ronde River, Imnaha River, Salmon River <strong>and</strong> Clearwater River<br />

subbasins. Four artificial propagation programs are part of this ESU.<br />

Historically, the primary fall-run Chinook salmon spawning areas occurred on the upper<br />

mainstem Snake River (Connor et al. 2005). A series of Snake River dams blocked access to the<br />

upper reaches, which significantly reduced spawning <strong>and</strong> rearing habitat. Consequently, salmon<br />

now reside in waters that are generally cooler than pre-dam habitats. Currently, natural<br />

spawning occurs at the upper end of Lower Granite Reservoir to Hells Canyon Dam, the lower<br />

reaches of the Imnaha, Gr<strong>and</strong>e Ronde, Clearwater <strong>and</strong> Tucannon rivers <strong>and</strong> small mainstem<br />

sections in the tailraces of the lower Snake River hydroelectric dams.<br />

Adult Snake River fall-run Chinook salmon enter the Columbia River in July <strong>and</strong> August, <strong>and</strong><br />

spawning occurs from October through November. Juveniles emerge from the gravels in March<br />

<strong>and</strong> April of the following year, moving downstream from natal spawning <strong>and</strong> early rearing areas<br />

from June through early autumn. Prior to dam construction, fall Chinook salmon were primarily<br />

ocean-type (migrated downstream <strong>and</strong> reared in the mainstem Snake River during their first<br />

year). However, today both an ocean-type <strong>and</strong> reservoir-type occur (Connor et al. 2005). The<br />

reservoir-type juveniles overwinter in pools created by dams before migrating to sea; this<br />

response is likely due to early development in cooler temperatures which prevents rapid growth.<br />

Phenotypic characteristics have shifted in apparent response to environmental changes from<br />

hydroelectric dams (Connor et al. 2005). Migration downstream appears to be influenced by<br />

flow velocity within both river <strong>and</strong> reservoir systems (Tiffan et al. 2009).<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!