20.02.2013 Views

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

EPA's Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Most of the chum within this ESU return to northern tributaries of the Columbia River (in<br />

Washington State), primarily the Grays River, in areas immediately below Bonneville Dam, <strong>and</strong><br />

in smaller numbers under the I-205 bridge near Vancouver. Chum populations that formerly<br />

occupied tributaries on the south bank of the Columbia (in Oregon) are considered extirpated or<br />

nearly so. Observers have documented spawning over multiple years in the mainstem Columbia<br />

River, near McCord Creek <strong>and</strong> Multnomah Falls in Oregon, although the number of spawners in<br />

these areas are generally quite low (McElhany et al. 2007).<br />

Status <strong>and</strong> Trends<br />

NMFS listed Columbia River chum salmon as threatened on March 25, 1999, <strong>and</strong> reaffirmed<br />

their threatened status on June 28, 2005 (71 FR 37160). Chum salmon in the Columbia River<br />

once numbered in the hundreds of thous<strong>and</strong>s of adults <strong>and</strong> were reported in almost every river in<br />

the Lower Columbia River basin, but by the 1950s most runs disappeared (Rich 1942, Marr<br />

1943, Fulton 1970). The total number of chum salmon returning to the Columbia River in the<br />

last 50 years has averaged a few thous<strong>and</strong> per year, with returns limited to a very restricted<br />

portion of the historical range. Significant spawning occurs in only two of the 16 historical<br />

populations, meaning that 88% of the historical populations are extirpated, or nearly so (Good et<br />

al., 2005). The two remaining populations are the Grays River <strong>and</strong> the lower Columbia Gorge<br />

tributaries (Good et al. 2005). Both long- <strong>and</strong> short-term trends for Grays River abundance are<br />

negative, but the current trend in abundance for the lower Columbia Gorge tributaries is slightly<br />

positive. Chum salmon appear to be extirpated from the Oregon portion of this ESU. In 2000,<br />

ODFW conducted surveys to determine the abundance <strong>and</strong> distribution of chum salmon in the<br />

Columbia River, <strong>and</strong> out of 30 sites surveyed, only one chum salmon was observed.<br />

Few Columbia River chum salmon have been observed in tributaries between The Dalles <strong>and</strong><br />

Bonneville dams. Surveys of the White Salmon River in 2002 found one male <strong>and</strong> one female<br />

carcass, with no evidence of spawning (Ehlke <strong>and</strong> Keller 2003). Chum salmon were not<br />

observed in any upper Columbia Gorge tributaries during the 2003 <strong>and</strong> 2004 spawning ground<br />

surveys. Finally, most Columbia River chum populations have been functionally extirpated or<br />

are presently at very low abundance levels.<br />

Historically, the Columbia River chum salmon supported a large commercial fishery in the first<br />

half of this century which l<strong>and</strong>ed more than 500,000 fish per year as recently as 1942.<br />

Commercial catches declined beginning in the mid-1950s, <strong>and</strong> in later years rarely exceeded<br />

2,000 per year (Good et al. 2005). During the 1980s <strong>and</strong> 1990s, the combined abundance of<br />

natural spawners for the lower Columbia Gorge, Washougal <strong>and</strong> Grays River populations was<br />

below 4,000 adults. In 2002, however, the abundance of natural spawners exhibited a substantial<br />

increase at several locations (estimate of natural spawners is approximately 20,000 adults) (Good<br />

et al. 2005). The cause of this dramatic increase in abundance is unknown. However, long- <strong>and</strong><br />

short-term productivity trends for populations are at or below replacement. The loss of offchannel<br />

habitat <strong>and</strong> the extirpation of approximately 17 historical populations increase this<br />

species’ vulnerability to environmental variability <strong>and</strong> catastrophic events. Overall, the<br />

populations that remain have low abundance, limited distribution, <strong>and</strong> poor connectivity (Good<br />

et al. 2005).<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!