24.03.2013 Views

chapter 3 rigid pavement - DOT On-Line Publications - Department ...

chapter 3 rigid pavement - DOT On-Line Publications - Department ...

chapter 3 rigid pavement - DOT On-Line Publications - Department ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DESIGN OF LENGTH<br />

Studies have shown that <strong>pavement</strong> thickness, base stiffness, and climate affect<br />

the maximum anticipated joint spacing beyond which transverse cracking can be<br />

expected [2]. Research indicates that there is a general relationship between<br />

the ratio of slab length (L) to the radius of relative stiffness (e) and<br />

transverse cracking. The radius of relative stiffness is a term defined by<br />

Westergaard to quantify the relationship between the stiffness of the<br />

foundation and the flexural stiffness of the slab. The radius of relative<br />

stiffness has a lineal dimension and is determined by the following equation:<br />

e - [Eh3/12k(I-r2)]0~'s<br />

where<br />

e - radius of relative stiffness (in.)<br />

E = concrete modulus of elasticity<br />

(psi.)<br />

h - <strong>pavement</strong> thickness (in.)<br />

l - Poisson's ratio of the <strong>pavement</strong><br />

k - modulus of subgrade reaction (pci.)<br />

Research data indicates that there is an increase in transverse cracking when<br />

the ratio L/e exceeds 5.0. Using the criteria of a maximum L/C ratio of 5.0,<br />

the allowable.joint spacing would increase with increased slab thickness, but<br />

decrease with increased (stiffer) foundation support conditions. The<br />

relationship between slab length, slab thickness, and foundation support for a<br />

L/C ratio of 5.0 is shown below.<br />

16<br />

200<br />

,300<br />

K - value (pci)<br />

3.1-.15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!