24.03.2013 Views

chapter 3 rigid pavement - DOT On-Line Publications - Department ...

chapter 3 rigid pavement - DOT On-Line Publications - Department ...

chapter 3 rigid pavement - DOT On-Line Publications - Department ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

during the AASHO Road Test. <strong>On</strong>e transverse joint faulted<br />

seriously, but investigation showed that the joint had been<br />

accidently sawed at some distance beyond the end of the dowel.<br />

Over the two-year test period, there were no other cases of<br />

measurable faulting at the joints, all of which were doweled.<br />

Based on road tests performed at the NARDO track in Italy, the<br />

XVIII World Road Congress reported that dowels significantly<br />

increased the <strong>pavement</strong> service life"'<br />

Dowels reduce deflections at the joint, which in turn reduce the<br />

magnitude of concrete flexural stresses. These deflections and<br />

stresses are reduced due to the load being more effectively<br />

shared with the adjoining slab through shear and bending stresses<br />

in the-dowel itself. Reduced concrete flexural stresses increase<br />

the fatigue life of the <strong>pavement</strong> and thus extend its service<br />

life. A theoretical analysis indicates that a 10" doweled slab<br />

with 80% load transfer will have the same deflection as a 12"<br />

undoweled slab with only 40% load transfer. Dowels can also<br />

reduce the potential for premature failure due to comer breaking<br />

caused by loss of,subgrade support through pumping.<br />

When dowels are properly designed and installed, they can reduce<br />

faulting and increase the <strong>pavement</strong>'s se-ice life. When they are<br />

not, dowels can cause premature failure of the <strong>pavement</strong> in the<br />

vicinity of the joint. Dowels too small in diameter to handle<br />

the necessary stresses have resulted in premature joint failures.<br />

Excessive concrete bearing stresses have crushed the concrete<br />

around the dowels and allowed faulting to occur. Considerable<br />

research has been performed recently which supports the use of<br />

larger bars (l-1/4 to l-1/2 inch). The AASHTO Guide for Design<br />

of Pavement Structures recommends a dowel diameter of l/Sth the<br />

<strong>pavement</strong> thickness, with the dowels placed near the center of the<br />

slab to minimize bending stresses. Most States are currently<br />

using, as a minimum, l-1/4 inch diameter bars, with good results.<br />

Most States are using dowels 18 inches long spaced at 12 inches<br />

and are reporting no problems.<br />

Dowels should also be corrosion-resistant. The use of epoxy-<br />

coated or stainless-steel dowels has been shown to provide the<br />

necessary resistance to corrosion. It is important that a bond-<br />

breaker be applied to the dowels to allow the slabs to freely and<br />

independently expand and contract without developing restraint<br />

forces. This bond-breaker should be applied to provide a thin<br />

but uniform coating.<br />

Many of the past performance problems associated with doweled<br />

joints were the result of excessive joint spacings, ranging from<br />

60 to 100 ft. The trend to plain doweled slabs with joint<br />

spacings of 15 to 20 ft. eliminates many of these problems.<br />

Shorter joint spacings result in smaller crack widths, which<br />

reduce the stresses acting on the dowels. The shorter spacing<br />

also reduces slab movement, which makes dowel alignment less<br />

3.2.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!