24.03.2013 Views

chapter 3 rigid pavement - DOT On-Line Publications - Department ...

chapter 3 rigid pavement - DOT On-Line Publications - Department ...

chapter 3 rigid pavement - DOT On-Line Publications - Department ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sublect Examination of Cores from Kansas I-70<br />

Ffm Chief, Pavement Division<br />

Uashington, D.C. 20590<br />

lo Mr. Thomas 3. Ptak,<br />

Deputy Regional Federal Highway Administrator HEO-07<br />

Kansas City, Missouri<br />

Da’e AL 2 5 1969<br />

Attached is Dr. Stephen Forster's report on the examination of the concrete<br />

cores from Kansas I-70 east of Abilene (Kansas Project No. 70-21 K-2588-01).<br />

Dr. Forster did not find any evidence of "D" cracking of the aggregate or<br />

alkali-aggregate reactivity. The crack faces appear rough enough to provide<br />

load transfer if the cracks remain tight. However, the cracks in these cores<br />

have opened to the point where load transfer has been 1 ost and the cracks are<br />

working.<br />

We are observing a significant number of jointed reinforced concrete <strong>pavement</strong>s<br />

(JRCP) with working cracks. The two factors believed to be the primary cause<br />

of working cracks in JRCP are corroded and locked up dowel bars and inadequate<br />

reinforcement. The introduction of epoxy coated dowels has reduced the risk<br />

of dowel bar corrosion. However, the procedures used to determine the amount<br />

of reinforcement in JRCP are not adequate.<br />

Reinforcement for JRCP is designed using the subgrade drag theory. The<br />

procedure does not consider the crack aggregate interlock capability or the<br />

repeated shear loads from traffic. Also, the subgrade drag theory does not<br />

directly consider climatic effects. In the absence of a good design procedure<br />

for the reinforcement in JRCP, we believe the following conclusion from an<br />

ongoing research study "Performance/Rehabilitation of Rigid Pavements"<br />

provides good guidance:<br />

nT;:, amount of reinforcement appeared to have an effect in controlling<br />

the amount of deteriorated transverse cracking. Although often<br />

confounded by the presence of corrosion-resistance dowel bars, <strong>pavement</strong><br />

sections that contained more than 0.1 percent reinforcing steel<br />

exhibited less deteriorated transverse cracking; sections with less than<br />

that amount often displayed a significant amount of transverse cracking,<br />

particularly in cold climates. A minimum of 0.1 percent reinforcing<br />

steel is therefore reconmtended, wither amounts required for harsher<br />

climates and longer slabs."<br />

3.4.1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!