24.03.2013 Views

chapter 3 rigid pavement - DOT On-Line Publications - Department ...

chapter 3 rigid pavement - DOT On-Line Publications - Department ...

chapter 3 rigid pavement - DOT On-Line Publications - Department ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE<br />

The coring results and statistics are summarized in Table 4 fc<br />

all six projects. A detailed listing of all dowel locations a 1<br />

measurements is provided in Appendix A.<br />

The types of analysis that were performed for each of the dowel<br />

placement parameters included the following areas. A basic<br />

analysis of averages and distribution densities was conducted<br />

using means and standard deviations, and these statistics are<br />

included in Table 4.<br />

Additionally, analysis was performed on the direction of<br />

deviation from the optimum dowel position (e.g. rotated left or<br />

right, rotated up or down, longitudinally offset forward or<br />

backward: with respect to the direction of paving). For all<br />

dowel placement parameters on all.projects, the data had<br />

approximately balanced normal distributions which were centered<br />

at or near the optimum dowel position. The lack of skewed<br />

distributions and lack of distributions centered well away from<br />

the optimum position indicate that the variation is due to normal<br />

random fluctuation of the two dowel placement methods. It<br />

indicates that no pervasive systematic problems exist in either<br />

of the dowel placement processes which would caused skewed data.<br />

Analysis of directional deviation of the dowel placement<br />

parameters versus the lateral position of the dowels across the<br />

roadway was also conducted. Again, for all placement paramete<br />

on all projects, the lateral position of the dowels across the<br />

roadway had no significant effect on the placement parameters of<br />

the dowels, indicating no pervasive systematic problems in either<br />

of the dowel placement processes.<br />

Vertical Translation: First, the distribution of dowel depths<br />

was examined. The standard deviations for the inserter projects<br />

(0.20" to 0.46") were comparable or smaller than those for the<br />

basket projects (0.35" to 0.57"), indicating that the inserter is<br />

capable of consistent depth placement of the dowels. This does<br />

not necessarily mean that the inserter is better in this respect<br />

than baskets, because the frame of reference is different for the<br />

two placement methods. The depth of the dowels was measured from<br />

the <strong>pavement</strong> surface down to the top of the dowels. Dowel<br />

baskets are staked to the base course, thus referenced to the<br />

bottom of the slab. As the thickness of the <strong>pavement</strong> varies<br />

along the length of the project (typically 1" or more<br />

fluctuation), the depth of the dowels, as measured from the<br />

surface, would vary directly with the fluctuation of the slab<br />

thickness. The placement of dowels by the inserter is referenced<br />

to the paver frame, and is thus more closely correlated with the<br />

<strong>pavement</strong> surface. Thus, fluctuation in <strong>pavement</strong> thickness should<br />

have little or no effect on dowel depths for the inserter<br />

projects. In conclusion, the dowel bar inserter is capable of<br />

3.512

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!