sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SDÜ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Forestry Journal<br />
also was filtered. The filter for each gall was examined with the aid <strong>of</strong> a microscope<br />
for presence or absence <strong>of</strong> conidia recognized as those <strong>of</strong> D. pinea based on<br />
morphological characteristics. For three randomly selected galls from each branch,<br />
conidia were counted in five compound microscope fields randomly located within the<br />
filtered area at magnifications <strong>of</strong> 40 to 200x. Lower magnification was used for filters<br />
with relatively few conidia and higher magnification (i.e., smaller fields) was used for<br />
filters with many conidia. The number <strong>of</strong> conidia in five fields was multiplied by<br />
respective factors to adjust for total filtered area. Galls were then oven dried and<br />
weighed to also allow expression <strong>of</strong> conidial numbers on the basis <strong>of</strong> oven dry weight<br />
(odw).<br />
To confirm pathogen identity, 12 filters (corresponding to four galls from each third<br />
<strong>of</strong> the tree crown) on which numerous conidia had been deposited were selected. A<br />
piece <strong>of</strong> the filter approximately 5 mm x 5 mm was excised and placed in a<br />
microcentrifuge tube. This was ground and then DNA was directly extracted using<br />
methods described by Smith and Stanosz (1995). DNA was amplified using speciesspecific<br />
primers developed by Smith and Stanosz (2006) that allow differentiation <strong>of</strong><br />
D. pinea from the similar conifer pathogen D. scrobiculata.<br />
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Every gall yielded conidia morphologically consistent with those <strong>of</strong> D. pinea,<br />
although the estimated numbers <strong>of</strong> conidia obtained varied widely. The range per gall<br />
was from 176 to 1,099,695 (mean = 249,599, standard error = 57,756). The range per<br />
gram odw was from 169 to 3,447,320 (mean = 462,691, standard error = 120,975).<br />
The numbers <strong>of</strong> galls categorized according to the estimated numbers <strong>of</strong> conidia<br />
extracted from each (for the 36 for which conidia were quantified) are displayed in<br />
Figure 2. For the majority <strong>of</strong> galls, this number was >10 4 conidia on both per gall and<br />
per gram odw bases.<br />
Figure 2: Numbers <strong>of</strong> Cooley spruce gall adelgid galls categorized by the<br />
estimated number <strong>of</strong> conidia extracted per gall.<br />
88