28.03.2013 Views

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SDÜ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Forestry Journal<br />

also was filtered. The filter for each gall was examined with the aid <strong>of</strong> a microscope<br />

for presence or absence <strong>of</strong> conidia recognized as those <strong>of</strong> D. pinea based on<br />

morphological characteristics. For three randomly selected galls from each branch,<br />

conidia were counted in five compound microscope fields randomly located within the<br />

filtered area at magnifications <strong>of</strong> 40 to 200x. Lower magnification was used for filters<br />

with relatively few conidia and higher magnification (i.e., smaller fields) was used for<br />

filters with many conidia. The number <strong>of</strong> conidia in five fields was multiplied by<br />

respective factors to adjust for total filtered area. Galls were then oven dried and<br />

weighed to also allow expression <strong>of</strong> conidial numbers on the basis <strong>of</strong> oven dry weight<br />

(odw).<br />

To confirm pathogen identity, 12 filters (corresponding to four galls from each third<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tree crown) on which numerous conidia had been deposited were selected. A<br />

piece <strong>of</strong> the filter approximately 5 mm x 5 mm was excised and placed in a<br />

microcentrifuge tube. This was ground and then DNA was directly extracted using<br />

methods described by Smith and Stanosz (1995). DNA was amplified using speciesspecific<br />

primers developed by Smith and Stanosz (2006) that allow differentiation <strong>of</strong><br />

D. pinea from the similar conifer pathogen D. scrobiculata.<br />

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Every gall yielded conidia morphologically consistent with those <strong>of</strong> D. pinea,<br />

although the estimated numbers <strong>of</strong> conidia obtained varied widely. The range per gall<br />

was from 176 to 1,099,695 (mean = 249,599, standard error = 57,756). The range per<br />

gram odw was from 169 to 3,447,320 (mean = 462,691, standard error = 120,975).<br />

The numbers <strong>of</strong> galls categorized according to the estimated numbers <strong>of</strong> conidia<br />

extracted from each (for the 36 for which conidia were quantified) are displayed in<br />

Figure 2. For the majority <strong>of</strong> galls, this number was >10 4 conidia on both per gall and<br />

per gram odw bases.<br />

Figure 2: Numbers <strong>of</strong> Cooley spruce gall adelgid galls categorized by the<br />

estimated number <strong>of</strong> conidia extracted per gall.<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!