28.03.2013 Views

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SDÜ ORMAN FAKÜLTESİ DERGİSİ<br />

disease and cankers on stems and branches (Brookhouser and Peterson, 1971;<br />

Peterson, 1977) and can have devastating effects on various conifers when it is<br />

associated with stress-inducing factors (Sinclair et al., 1987; Swart et al., 1987;<br />

Chou and Mackenzie, 1988; Nicholls and Ostry 1990; Stanosz et al., 2001).<br />

Although diseases caused by the fungus are usually on trees under stress,<br />

healthy trees, e<strong>special</strong>ly nursery seedlings can also be infected (Palmer and<br />

Nichols, 1985). Pinus species are the most common hosts <strong>of</strong> the fungus, but Abies<br />

Mill., Chamaecyparis Spach., Cupressus L., Larix Mill., Picea A. Dietr.,<br />

Pseudotsuga Carriere and Thuja L. species are among hosts <strong>of</strong> the pathogen<br />

(Punithalingam and Waterston, 1970; Swart and Wingfield, 1991). Previous studies<br />

reported significant interactions among host species, environmental factors and the<br />

virulence <strong>of</strong> the isolates (Swart and Wingfield, 1991; Blodgett and Stanosz, 1997;<br />

Adams et al., 2002; Blodgett and Bonello, 2003).<br />

Two different S. sapinea morphotypes have been described and are referred to<br />

as A and B (Palmer et al., 1987; Smith and Stanosz, 1995; de Wet et al., 2000;<br />

Burguess and Wingfield, 2001). While D. pinea is accepted name for morphotype<br />

A, morphotype B has been recognized as Diplodia scrobiculata J. de Wet, B.<br />

Slippers & M. J. Wingfield (de Wet et al., 2003). It is reported that they differ in<br />

morphology, cultural characteristics and aggressiveness against host plants (Smith<br />

and Stanosz, 1995; Blodgett and Stanosz, 1997; Blodgett and Bonello, 2003).<br />

Eventhough D. pinea was recorded sixteen years ago for the first time on Pinus<br />

pinea and Pinus pinaster (Unligil and Ertas, 1993), very little is known about the<br />

distribution and the damage <strong>of</strong> the disease by far in Turkey (Doğmuş- Lehtijärvi,<br />

et al. 2007). Studies carried out in the western part <strong>of</strong> Taurus Mountains located in<br />

the Mediterranean part <strong>of</strong> Turkey, in Isparta province showed that D. pinea was the<br />

main agent <strong>of</strong> the shoot blight <strong>of</strong> Calabrian pines (Pinus brutia Ten.) (Doğmuş-<br />

Lehtijärvi et al., 2007). The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine the pathogenicity <strong>of</strong><br />

D. pinea isolates obtained from P. brutia showing shoot blight symptoms, on 6<br />

conifer species, under field conditions.<br />

2- MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Five-year-old potted Pinus nigra Arnold, Pinus brutia Ten, Pinus sylvestris L.,<br />

Cedrus libani A. Rich., Abies nordmanniana ssp. bornmülleriana Mattfelt<br />

seedlings obtained from Eskişehir and Balıkesir forest nurseries and 3- year-old<br />

Juniperus excelsa Bieb seedlings obtained from Eğirdir forest nursery were used as<br />

the plant materials. Fungal materials were the five D. pinea isolates obtained from<br />

the Calabrian pine (P. brutia) shoots showing blight symptoms in Aşağı-Gökdere<br />

location <strong>of</strong> Isparta province, Turkey. The isolates were confirmed as D. pinea by<br />

Glen Stanosz, (Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Pathology, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin-Madison,<br />

personal communication) using species-specific primers (Smith and Stanosz 2006).<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!