sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SDÜ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Forestry Journal<br />
from Site 3 and is near to Sevnica. It is located on Kremenc hill (350 m a.s.l.)<br />
where two specimens <strong>of</strong> Eutypella canker on sycamore maple were found and<br />
collected on shady side <strong>of</strong> the hill. (5) A single diseased sycamore maple was<br />
found at Bohor hill (580 m a.s.l.), near the town <strong>of</strong> Kozje, which is located 22 km<br />
east <strong>of</strong> site 4. (6) Site 6 is located at Rogaška Slatina (230 m a.s.l.) where 55<br />
Eutypella cankers were found – all on field maple. This site is the most eastern<br />
place where Eutypella canker <strong>of</strong> maple was found in Slovenia. It is located about 1<br />
km from the border with Croatia. At Site 6 one field maple was gathered. Distance<br />
from Site 1 is 90 km. Altogether, <strong>of</strong> the 23 diseased trees collected, 19 trees were<br />
sycamore maple and 4 trees were field maple. Sites 1–5 had rich, rather moist soils<br />
in common which suits the sycamore maple’s demands for water, while Site 6<br />
parent material was sandstone, soils were quite warm and dry, and location was on<br />
sunny side <strong>of</strong> the hill.<br />
Site 1 and 6 were chosen to determine the frequency <strong>of</strong> Eutypella canker <strong>of</strong><br />
maple in forest stands.<br />
2.2. Common measurable characteristics<br />
Some basics measurements were made for all specimens collected. (1) The<br />
position <strong>of</strong> canker on trunk was measured from the ground to the center <strong>of</strong> the<br />
canker which is usually represented by a dead branch stub (Davidson and Lorenz,<br />
1938). When the centre <strong>of</strong> the canker was within arm’s reach the position was<br />
determined by tape measure, otherwise a Haglöf Sweden Vertex III height<br />
measurer was used. (2) The diameter <strong>of</strong> trees at breast height was measured by log<br />
calliper. (3) Canker circumference was determined by tape measure at the centre <strong>of</strong><br />
the canker. (4) Canker length was determined by tape measure.<br />
2.3. Area and shape <strong>of</strong> the canker on the trunk<br />
The canker area was measured and calculated for all 23 specimens collected.<br />
Area measurement was performed by fastening a transparent plastic foil to canker<br />
by pins and drawing the outline <strong>of</strong> the canker using permanent marker. Three<br />
different densities <strong>of</strong> perithecia, bark without perithecia, and areas where bark had<br />
already fallen <strong>of</strong>f were also marked on the foil. The foil was then put down on a<br />
flat surface with white paper for background and the contours were digitalized.<br />
Each digital photo was taken with a 10 cm long scale bar to allow for the correct<br />
calibration <strong>of</strong> the photos. The areas were calculated using S<strong>of</strong>t Imaging System<br />
analySIS ® Pro function for measuring arbitrary areas. The areas <strong>of</strong> different<br />
densities <strong>of</strong> perithecia were used later for calculating ascospore discharge at the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> the whole canker.<br />
2.4. Isolates<br />
Dissectional study enabled us to determine the places where the fungus actually<br />
lives and is active. It also enabled us to search for other species <strong>of</strong> fungi present in<br />
the canker. Trunk cross sections were taken at 10 cm intervals. The isolations were<br />
made as described below. Samples were taken within a period <strong>of</strong> 24 hours after<br />
152