sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. RESULTS<br />
SDÜ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Forestry Journal<br />
3.1. Incidence <strong>of</strong> the disease in forest stands<br />
Site 1 had the greatest number <strong>of</strong> diseased trees, altogether 70 trees. Eutypella<br />
cankers usually form infection centers, while single occurrences are rarely found<br />
(Kliejunas and Kuntz, 1974; Martinez, 2003) since ascospores are disseminated<br />
only over short distances (Johnson and Kuntz, 1979). There were four infection<br />
centers and six single trees distributed around the hill. A full inventory <strong>of</strong> one<br />
infection centre at Site 1 was performed. All trees were identified and measured for<br />
their diameter at breast height (DBH) within an area <strong>of</strong> 2.7 hectares. In the<br />
searched area, 20 tree species were determined. The most common species was the<br />
sycamore maple (41.7% <strong>of</strong> all trees), followed by the big leaf linden (Tilia<br />
platyphyllos Scop.) with 15.3%, the common hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.) with<br />
10.6%, and the northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) with 9.7%. Among 606<br />
sycamore maples in the 2.7 hectare area, 3.3% were diseased by E. parasitica. This<br />
is within the range <strong>of</strong> the usual incidence <strong>of</strong> Eutypella canker (Gross, 1984b).<br />
At Site 6 on the area <strong>of</strong> 7.2 ha, frequency <strong>of</strong> Eutypella canker was determined.<br />
28.6% <strong>of</strong> 192 field maples had canker.<br />
3.2. Common measurable characteristics<br />
Table 1 shows a summary <strong>of</strong> the statistics for four variables. The sample size was<br />
different for each variable measured. Eutypella cankers were found over the entire<br />
DBH range from thin to large, as previously reported by French (1969). The average<br />
trunk diameter at breast height was 25 cm. The relative frequency <strong>of</strong> cankered trees<br />
among 7 classes showed that 52% <strong>of</strong> diseased trees had a DBH between 11 and 22 cm.<br />
65% <strong>of</strong> all trees with Eutypella canker occurred on first 220 cm <strong>of</strong> trunk above<br />
the ground line, and 92% <strong>of</strong> all cankers occurred on the first 435 cm <strong>of</strong> trunk.<br />
These results are comparable to French (1969), who noted that 60% <strong>of</strong> all cankers<br />
occurred on the first 244 cm <strong>of</strong> trunk and 81.5% on the first 488 cm <strong>of</strong> trunk.<br />
33 cankers were measured for canker length. 85% <strong>of</strong> cankers did not exceed a<br />
length <strong>of</strong> 120 cm. Gross (1984a) measured 27 trees and the range <strong>of</strong> canker length<br />
was from 10 cm to 170 cm with an average <strong>of</strong> 67 cm. Wide range <strong>of</strong> canker length<br />
was directly related to the age <strong>of</strong> the canker and could be explained as such.<br />
Table 1: Summary statistics for common measurable characteristics <strong>of</strong> Eutypella canker<br />
Trunk DBH<br />
(cm)<br />
Vertical<br />
distribution (cm)<br />
154<br />
Length <strong>of</strong><br />
canker (cm)<br />
Width <strong>of</strong><br />
canker (cm)<br />
Sample size 38 37 33 31<br />
Minimum 11 35 30 23<br />
Maximum 61 1150 233 115<br />
Average 25 216 102 59<br />
95% confidence<br />
interval (±)<br />
3.6 73.9 18.6 9.5