sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SDÜ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Forestry Journal<br />
supplemented with 5% (v/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a PCR enhancer.<br />
DNA fragments encompassing the ITS and tefa DNA regions were amplified using<br />
the primer combinations ITS1/ITS4 and EF595F/EF1160R, respectively (White et<br />
al., 1990; Kauserud and Schumacher, 2001). The DNA was PCR-amplified as in<br />
previous studies (Tomšovský et al., 2006) using a Mastercycler® ep thermocycler<br />
(Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). In cases when amplification <strong>of</strong> the ITS and tefa<br />
regions was difficult, the primer pairs ITS1F/ITS4B and EF-526F/EF-1567R,<br />
respectively, were used in nested PCR (for primer sequences, see Gardes and<br />
Bruns, 1993; O’Donnell et al., 1998).<br />
The amplified fragments were sequenced by the DNA Sequencing Service <strong>of</strong><br />
Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea). We added an ITS sequence from the Porodaedalea<br />
chrysoloma neotype (Genbank acc. no. AF123440; Larsen and Stenlid, 1999) to the<br />
data set. ITS and tefa sequences <strong>of</strong> Onnia leporina were chosen as outgroups based<br />
on the results <strong>of</strong> Wagner and Fischer 2002.<br />
Sequences <strong>of</strong> each individual marker were aligned using the Clustal W<br />
algorithm in BioEdit and adjusted manually. To determine whether the datasets<br />
from different genetic markers were in significant conflict, partition homogeneity<br />
tests were performed between the markers in all possible pair-wise combinations.<br />
The tests were done in PAUP 4.0b10 using 100 replicates and the heuristic general<br />
search option. The null hypothesis <strong>of</strong> congruence was rejected if p < 0.01<br />
Phylogenies were generated in MrBayes version 3.1.2.The best-fit model and<br />
parameters given by MrModeltest were used in the analyses. Markov chains were<br />
initiated from a random tree and were run for 2,000.000 generations; the samples<br />
were taken every 100th generation. Posterior probabilities (PP) were used as<br />
Bayesian branch supports on the consensus trees. In addition, bootstrap branch<br />
support values (BP) were estimated in PAUP 4.0b10 under the maximum<br />
parsimony criterion using 1000 replicate datasets with random sequence addition<br />
during each heuristic search.<br />
3. RESULTS<br />
Partition homogeneity tests showed significant conflict between the two genetic<br />
markers used (p ≤ 0.01). This did not allow us to perform a combined analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
the ITS and tefa sequence data. The results <strong>of</strong> the phylogenetic analyses <strong>of</strong> the two<br />
datasets are ambiguous. The ITS phylogram shows three main groups, while the<br />
tefa phylogram shows four. In ITS data set, the most basal lineage within the<br />
ingroup is composed <strong>of</strong> P. chrysoloma specimens from the Czech Republic,<br />
Estonia, Romania, and Southern Sweden, including the P. chrysoloma neotype.<br />
This P. chrysoloma group is also consistent in the tefa phylogram.<br />
The second group includes P. pini specimens from the Czech Republic, Estonia,<br />
Croatia, Lithuania, and Sweden, including a specimen growing on Larix. The<br />
position <strong>of</strong> this group is variable; it forms a well supported terminal clade in the<br />
ITS phylogram, but it is placed in the centre <strong>of</strong> the tefa phylogram.<br />
248