28.03.2013 Views

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SDÜ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Forestry Journal<br />

supplemented with 5% (v/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a PCR enhancer.<br />

DNA fragments encompassing the ITS and tefa DNA regions were amplified using<br />

the primer combinations ITS1/ITS4 and EF595F/EF1160R, respectively (White et<br />

al., 1990; Kauserud and Schumacher, 2001). The DNA was PCR-amplified as in<br />

previous studies (Tomšovský et al., 2006) using a Mastercycler® ep thermocycler<br />

(Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). In cases when amplification <strong>of</strong> the ITS and tefa<br />

regions was difficult, the primer pairs ITS1F/ITS4B and EF-526F/EF-1567R,<br />

respectively, were used in nested PCR (for primer sequences, see Gardes and<br />

Bruns, 1993; O’Donnell et al., 1998).<br />

The amplified fragments were sequenced by the DNA Sequencing Service <strong>of</strong><br />

Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea). We added an ITS sequence from the Porodaedalea<br />

chrysoloma neotype (Genbank acc. no. AF123440; Larsen and Stenlid, 1999) to the<br />

data set. ITS and tefa sequences <strong>of</strong> Onnia leporina were chosen as outgroups based<br />

on the results <strong>of</strong> Wagner and Fischer 2002.<br />

Sequences <strong>of</strong> each individual marker were aligned using the Clustal W<br />

algorithm in BioEdit and adjusted manually. To determine whether the datasets<br />

from different genetic markers were in significant conflict, partition homogeneity<br />

tests were performed between the markers in all possible pair-wise combinations.<br />

The tests were done in PAUP 4.0b10 using 100 replicates and the heuristic general<br />

search option. The null hypothesis <strong>of</strong> congruence was rejected if p < 0.01<br />

Phylogenies were generated in MrBayes version 3.1.2.The best-fit model and<br />

parameters given by MrModeltest were used in the analyses. Markov chains were<br />

initiated from a random tree and were run for 2,000.000 generations; the samples<br />

were taken every 100th generation. Posterior probabilities (PP) were used as<br />

Bayesian branch supports on the consensus trees. In addition, bootstrap branch<br />

support values (BP) were estimated in PAUP 4.0b10 under the maximum<br />

parsimony criterion using 1000 replicate datasets with random sequence addition<br />

during each heuristic search.<br />

3. RESULTS<br />

Partition homogeneity tests showed significant conflict between the two genetic<br />

markers used (p ≤ 0.01). This did not allow us to perform a combined analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the ITS and tefa sequence data. The results <strong>of</strong> the phylogenetic analyses <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

datasets are ambiguous. The ITS phylogram shows three main groups, while the<br />

tefa phylogram shows four. In ITS data set, the most basal lineage within the<br />

ingroup is composed <strong>of</strong> P. chrysoloma specimens from the Czech Republic,<br />

Estonia, Romania, and Southern Sweden, including the P. chrysoloma neotype.<br />

This P. chrysoloma group is also consistent in the tefa phylogram.<br />

The second group includes P. pini specimens from the Czech Republic, Estonia,<br />

Croatia, Lithuania, and Sweden, including a specimen growing on Larix. The<br />

position <strong>of</strong> this group is variable; it forms a well supported terminal clade in the<br />

ITS phylogram, but it is placed in the centre <strong>of</strong> the tefa phylogram.<br />

248

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!