sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SDÜ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Forestry Journal<br />
Two groups, A and B, were distinguished within S. sapinea sensu lato (Palmer<br />
et al., 1987) based on several characteristics such as morphology, growth, virulence<br />
and molecular markers (Palmer et al., 1987; Smith and Stanosz, 1995; de Wet et<br />
al., 2000; Burguess and Wingfield, 2001). Recently, the B group has been<br />
recognized as a distinct species and assigned the name Diplodia scrobiculata J. de<br />
Wet, B. Slippers & M. J. Wingfield (de Wet et al., 2003). At the same time, the A<br />
group was named as Diplodia pinea (Desmaz.) J. Kickx fil. (syn. Sphaeropsis<br />
sapinea (Fr.:Fr.) Dyko & Sutton in Sutton) (de Wet et al., 2003). In terms <strong>of</strong><br />
pathogenicity, D. pinea has been shown to be more aggressive than D. scrobiculata<br />
(Blodgett and Stanosz, 1997; Blodgett and Bonello, 2003).<br />
The reported geographic and host ranges <strong>of</strong> D. pinea and D. scrobiculata are<br />
broad and overlapping. Not only do distributions and hosts overlap, but D. pinea<br />
and D. scrobiculata also are known to occur together. In this sense, both species<br />
have been isolated from individual red pine (Pinus resinosa Aiton.) plantations<br />
(Palmer, 1991; Stanosz et al., 2005) or even from a single tree (Morelet and<br />
Chandelier, 1993) or a single sample (Smith and Stanosz, 2006). Those<br />
experiments stated the potential for intimate association between D. pinea and D.<br />
scrobiculata within host tissues, but relatively little is known about their local cooccurrence<br />
and the implications <strong>of</strong> this fact for the disease development, and<br />
subsequent survival.<br />
Complete eradication <strong>of</strong> the pathogen is difficult due to latent infection <strong>of</strong><br />
symptomless tissues <strong>of</strong> apparently healthy trees (Flowers et al., 2001; Stanosz et<br />
al., 2005; Maresi et al., 2007; Stanosz et al., 2007); however, proper control<br />
measures could reduce the spread and virulence <strong>of</strong> the disease. Among those<br />
measures, the use <strong>of</strong> biological control is <strong>of</strong> increasing interest since it provides an<br />
effective and environmentally safer alternative to chemical application. Several<br />
microorganisms, mainly fungi, have been observed to cause ‘systemic induced<br />
resistance’ in the host after their inoculation into the plant, which may prompt a<br />
lower host susceptibility to later infections with D. pinea (Luchi et al., 2005;<br />
Blodgett et al., 2007; Muñoz et al., 2008). On the other hand, several endophytes,<br />
which have been shown to produce secondary metabolites, some <strong>of</strong> them with<br />
antifungal properties (Tan and Zou, 2001; Schulz et al., 2002), have shown<br />
antagonism with several pathogens and they have been assessed as biological<br />
control agents (Mehrotra et al., 1988; Holdenrieder and Greig, 1998; Roy et al.,<br />
2001). However in the literature, few studies dealing with the use <strong>of</strong> endophytes as<br />
biological control agents against D. pinea can be found.<br />
Therefore, the main aim <strong>of</strong> the study was to analyse the effect <strong>of</strong> D.<br />
scrobiculata and several fungal endophytes, isolated from healthy shoots <strong>of</strong> Pinus<br />
resinosa and P. banksiana Lamb. (jack pine) adult trees, on the symptom severity<br />
72