28.03.2013 Views

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SDÜ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Forestry Journal<br />

Two groups, A and B, were distinguished within S. sapinea sensu lato (Palmer<br />

et al., 1987) based on several characteristics such as morphology, growth, virulence<br />

and molecular markers (Palmer et al., 1987; Smith and Stanosz, 1995; de Wet et<br />

al., 2000; Burguess and Wingfield, 2001). Recently, the B group has been<br />

recognized as a distinct species and assigned the name Diplodia scrobiculata J. de<br />

Wet, B. Slippers & M. J. Wingfield (de Wet et al., 2003). At the same time, the A<br />

group was named as Diplodia pinea (Desmaz.) J. Kickx fil. (syn. Sphaeropsis<br />

sapinea (Fr.:Fr.) Dyko & Sutton in Sutton) (de Wet et al., 2003). In terms <strong>of</strong><br />

pathogenicity, D. pinea has been shown to be more aggressive than D. scrobiculata<br />

(Blodgett and Stanosz, 1997; Blodgett and Bonello, 2003).<br />

The reported geographic and host ranges <strong>of</strong> D. pinea and D. scrobiculata are<br />

broad and overlapping. Not only do distributions and hosts overlap, but D. pinea<br />

and D. scrobiculata also are known to occur together. In this sense, both species<br />

have been isolated from individual red pine (Pinus resinosa Aiton.) plantations<br />

(Palmer, 1991; Stanosz et al., 2005) or even from a single tree (Morelet and<br />

Chandelier, 1993) or a single sample (Smith and Stanosz, 2006). Those<br />

experiments stated the potential for intimate association between D. pinea and D.<br />

scrobiculata within host tissues, but relatively little is known about their local cooccurrence<br />

and the implications <strong>of</strong> this fact for the disease development, and<br />

subsequent survival.<br />

Complete eradication <strong>of</strong> the pathogen is difficult due to latent infection <strong>of</strong><br />

symptomless tissues <strong>of</strong> apparently healthy trees (Flowers et al., 2001; Stanosz et<br />

al., 2005; Maresi et al., 2007; Stanosz et al., 2007); however, proper control<br />

measures could reduce the spread and virulence <strong>of</strong> the disease. Among those<br />

measures, the use <strong>of</strong> biological control is <strong>of</strong> increasing interest since it provides an<br />

effective and environmentally safer alternative to chemical application. Several<br />

microorganisms, mainly fungi, have been observed to cause ‘systemic induced<br />

resistance’ in the host after their inoculation into the plant, which may prompt a<br />

lower host susceptibility to later infections with D. pinea (Luchi et al., 2005;<br />

Blodgett et al., 2007; Muñoz et al., 2008). On the other hand, several endophytes,<br />

which have been shown to produce secondary metabolites, some <strong>of</strong> them with<br />

antifungal properties (Tan and Zou, 2001; Schulz et al., 2002), have shown<br />

antagonism with several pathogens and they have been assessed as biological<br />

control agents (Mehrotra et al., 1988; Holdenrieder and Greig, 1998; Roy et al.,<br />

2001). However in the literature, few studies dealing with the use <strong>of</strong> endophytes as<br />

biological control agents against D. pinea can be found.<br />

Therefore, the main aim <strong>of</strong> the study was to analyse the effect <strong>of</strong> D.<br />

scrobiculata and several fungal endophytes, isolated from healthy shoots <strong>of</strong> Pinus<br />

resinosa and P. banksiana Lamb. (jack pine) adult trees, on the symptom severity<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!