28.03.2013 Views

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SDÜ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Forestry Journal<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the middle density <strong>of</strong> perithecia was included in the high density. It was<br />

suggested that about one-third <strong>of</strong> the total area covered with perithecia belonged to<br />

low density class, one third to middle density, and one third to high density class.<br />

20 out <strong>of</strong> 23 cankers were oval shaped, two cankers were triangular, and only<br />

one was shaped irregularly. All triangular shaped cankers had the centre <strong>of</strong> the<br />

canker close to the ground line. The irregular shape <strong>of</strong> the canker area has been<br />

already observed and explained (Davidson and Lorenz, 1938). The annual<br />

extension <strong>of</strong> the cankered areas is usually uniform and therefore the shape <strong>of</strong><br />

canker area is usually oval. However, this extension is occasionally stopped<br />

suddenly by some unknown cause, around either the entire margin or only a portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> it. Such sudden cessation <strong>of</strong> the extension gives the canker an irregular shape.<br />

The extension <strong>of</strong> the canker is faster in the longitudinal direction than in the<br />

transverse direction. This leads to the elongated oval shape <strong>of</strong> canker area. Cankers<br />

could be from 1.32 to 2.62 longer than they are wide while the average<br />

length/width proportion was 1.74 (± 0.18 at 95% confidence level).<br />

Within the canker shape analysis it was observed that the trunk gradually grows<br />

thicker up to canker centre and then the trunk thins down. The thickness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

canker was measured for 14 specimens at 10 cm intervals. It was determined that<br />

the thickness <strong>of</strong> the Eutypella canker was represented by a parabola very well.<br />

Polynomial regression using a second order polynomial model was performed for<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the 14 specimens. The R 2 was up to 97.8% and the average R 2 was 76.7%.<br />

This shows again that the canker shape is a regular oval.<br />

Table 2: Summary statistics for different kinds <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> Eutypella cankers<br />

Canker area<br />

(dm 2 ) Whole Without bark low<br />

density<br />

156<br />

Perithecia (averages)<br />

middle<br />

density<br />

high<br />

density<br />

Minimum 12.3 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Maximum 168.0 43.7 14.9 16.6 45.8 64.7<br />

Mean 53.3 11.3 6.5 3.9 *<br />

95% confidence<br />

interval (±)<br />

Total<br />

10.9 20.5<br />

20.6 6.3 2.2 1.8 7.3 9.2<br />

* Middle density <strong>of</strong> perithecia could hardly be distinguished from high density.<br />

Therefore, some portion <strong>of</strong> the middle density <strong>of</strong> perithecia was included in the<br />

high density.<br />

3.4. Isolates<br />

Davidson and Lorenz (1938) stated that a single species <strong>of</strong> Eutypella has been<br />

consistently isolated from discolored wood from under the centre and from near the<br />

margins <strong>of</strong> the discoloration. Our study strongly supports this statement. From 9<br />

dissected trees, 97 discs and 237 boring holes, 1896 samples were cultivated on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!