sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
sdu faculty of forestry journal special edition 2009 - Orman Fakültesi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SDÜ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Forestry Journal<br />
portion <strong>of</strong> the middle density <strong>of</strong> perithecia was included in the high density. It was<br />
suggested that about one-third <strong>of</strong> the total area covered with perithecia belonged to<br />
low density class, one third to middle density, and one third to high density class.<br />
20 out <strong>of</strong> 23 cankers were oval shaped, two cankers were triangular, and only<br />
one was shaped irregularly. All triangular shaped cankers had the centre <strong>of</strong> the<br />
canker close to the ground line. The irregular shape <strong>of</strong> the canker area has been<br />
already observed and explained (Davidson and Lorenz, 1938). The annual<br />
extension <strong>of</strong> the cankered areas is usually uniform and therefore the shape <strong>of</strong><br />
canker area is usually oval. However, this extension is occasionally stopped<br />
suddenly by some unknown cause, around either the entire margin or only a portion<br />
<strong>of</strong> it. Such sudden cessation <strong>of</strong> the extension gives the canker an irregular shape.<br />
The extension <strong>of</strong> the canker is faster in the longitudinal direction than in the<br />
transverse direction. This leads to the elongated oval shape <strong>of</strong> canker area. Cankers<br />
could be from 1.32 to 2.62 longer than they are wide while the average<br />
length/width proportion was 1.74 (± 0.18 at 95% confidence level).<br />
Within the canker shape analysis it was observed that the trunk gradually grows<br />
thicker up to canker centre and then the trunk thins down. The thickness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
canker was measured for 14 specimens at 10 cm intervals. It was determined that<br />
the thickness <strong>of</strong> the Eutypella canker was represented by a parabola very well.<br />
Polynomial regression using a second order polynomial model was performed for<br />
each <strong>of</strong> the 14 specimens. The R 2 was up to 97.8% and the average R 2 was 76.7%.<br />
This shows again that the canker shape is a regular oval.<br />
Table 2: Summary statistics for different kinds <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> Eutypella cankers<br />
Canker area<br />
(dm 2 ) Whole Without bark low<br />
density<br />
156<br />
Perithecia (averages)<br />
middle<br />
density<br />
high<br />
density<br />
Minimum 12.3 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Maximum 168.0 43.7 14.9 16.6 45.8 64.7<br />
Mean 53.3 11.3 6.5 3.9 *<br />
95% confidence<br />
interval (±)<br />
Total<br />
10.9 20.5<br />
20.6 6.3 2.2 1.8 7.3 9.2<br />
* Middle density <strong>of</strong> perithecia could hardly be distinguished from high density.<br />
Therefore, some portion <strong>of</strong> the middle density <strong>of</strong> perithecia was included in the<br />
high density.<br />
3.4. Isolates<br />
Davidson and Lorenz (1938) stated that a single species <strong>of</strong> Eutypella has been<br />
consistently isolated from discolored wood from under the centre and from near the<br />
margins <strong>of</strong> the discoloration. Our study strongly supports this statement. From 9<br />
dissected trees, 97 discs and 237 boring holes, 1896 samples were cultivated on